This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Intention to adopt clinical decision support systems in a developing country: effect of Physician’s perceived professional autonomy, involvement and belief: a cross-sectional study
© Sambasivan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 June 2012
Accepted: 27 November 2012
Published: 5 December 2012
Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are regarded as a key element to enhance decision-making in a healthcare environment to improve the quality of medical care delivery. The concern of having new CDSS unused is still one of the biggest issues in developing countries for the developers and implementers of clinical IT systems. The main objectives of this study are to determine whether (1) the physician’s perceived professional autonomy, (2) involvement in the decision to implement CDSS and (3) the belief that CDSS will improve job performance increase the intention to adopt CDSS. Four hypotheses were formulated and tested.
A questionnaire-based survey conducted between July 2010 and December 2010. The study was conducted in seven public and five private hospitals in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Before contacting the hospitals, necessary permission was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Malaysia and the questionnaire was vetted by the ethics committee of the ministry. Physicians working in 12 hospitals from 10 different specialties participated in the study. The sampling method used was stratified random sampling and the physicians were stratified based on the specialty. A total of 450 physicians were selected using a random number generator. Each of these physicians was given a questionnaire and out of 450 questionnaires, 335 (response rate – 74%) were returned and 309 (69%) were deemed usable.
The hypotheses were tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Salient results are: (1) Physicians’ perceived threat to professional autonomy lowers the intention to use CDSS (p < 0.01); (2) Physicians involvement in the planning, design and implementation increases their intention to use CDSS (p < 0.01); (3) Physicians belief that the new CDSS will improve his/her job performance increases their intention to use CDSS (p < 0.01).
The proposed model with the three main constructs (physician’s professional characteristic, involvement and belief) explains 47% of the variance in the intention to use CDSS. This is significantly higher than the models addressed so far. The results will have a major impact in implementing CDSS in developing countries.
A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is regarded as an application of decision support system (DSS) which takes patient data as input and generates patient-specific advice. These knowledge-based systems through a process of reasoning techniques generate diagnostic and treatment options and care planning[1, 2]. The use of IT in health care practices is mainly for two purposes: creating and maintaining electronic medical record (EMR) of each patient and integrating those records using computerized decision support systems to generate specific medical advice. CDSS applications in healthcare are regarded as a key element to enhance decision-making in a healthcare environment to improve the quality of medical care delivery and many CDSSs have been shown to improve physician performance. CDSS uses include: alerts and reminders, diagnostic assistance, therapy critiquing and planning, prescribing decision support, information retrieval and image recognition and interpretation. However, factors affecting the physicians’ IT adoption behavior are not completely clear[6, 7]. The concern of having new CDSS unused is still one of the biggest issues for the developers and implementers of clinical IT systems. Besides low usage, problems in the information systems for patient care can also occur while (1) entering and retrieving information and (2) communicating and coordinating the information for decision-making. Therefore, proper management of CDSS and related systems are critical for providing proper healthcare.
Growing use of IT in healthcare in developed countries has been driven by the belief and the evidence that these systems can help enhance the quality of health care. A recent study involving outpatient physicians in US shows that EMR and CDSS are being used in 30% and 17% of the patient visits, respectively. The health care systems and use of IT in developed countries have been in existence for at least two decades more than the developing countries and these countries pose a much greater challenge in implementing computerized decision support systems. There are many critical reasons cited for the problems of low usage of CDSS in developing countries: (1) dependence on EMR to supply the relevant data and the problems in implementing EMR, (2) poor human interface design, (3) problems in fitting CDSS into the routine process of patient care, (4) reluctance of physicians to use the system, (5) computer illiteracy of physicians and (6) cost of purchase and implementation.
A popular framework that has been developed and used extensively to study the usage behavior of IT systems is the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. However, this model which unifies eight different models is for general applications and does not take into account the unique characteristics of the users. A recent study on usage of EMR based on UTAUT shows that the model can explain only 20% of the variance in the usage intention of EMR. In our study, we propose other factors that take into account the characteristics of physicians that play a critical role in the acceptance and usage of technology such as CDSS especially, in developing countries.
The aim of our research work for this paper is to determine the factors that influence adoption and therefore, use of clinical decision support systems by physicians in hospitals. In this research, we do not address private clinical practices. Specifically, we study the effect of physician’s perceived threat to professional autonomy, physician’s level of involvement in deciding the implementation of CDSS, the physician’s belief that the new CDSS will improve his/her job performance (Performance expectancy) and the degree of ease associated with the use of the system (Effort expectancy).
In order to develop a framework for this study, we used UTAUT model as a base. However, we did not consider the constructs, facilitating conditions and subjective norms used in the original UTAUT model. When the constructs such as performance expectancy and effort expectancy come into play, facilitating conditions become insignificant in explaining and in predicting intention especially in a pre-implementation study. Moreover, the empirical results signify that facilitating conditions have a direct effect on actual usage and not on behavioral intention. There are studies that indicate the insignificant role of subjective norms in healthcare professional’s decision making about using IT because of the self-autonomy of the professionals[1, 15, 17, 18]. There are studies that report otherwise[19, 20]. However, in this research we consider only the unique characteristics of healthcare professionals. Due to these reasons, we omitted facilitating conditions and subjective norms.
Study site and sample
The study was conducted in Malaysia, a fast developing country in South-East Asia. Physicians from seven public and five private hospitals participated in this study. The hospitals are located in and around the capital city, Kuala Lumpur. An approval letter to conduct the study was obtained from the Ministry of Health after the ethical committee vetted and approved the questionnaire and the study plan. This letter helped us gain access to the physicians in these hospitals. The sampling method used was stratified random sampling and the physicians were stratified based on the specialty. The size of the hospital (in terms of total number of physicians) was used to determine the number of physicians to be sampled from a particular hospital. At the next level, within each hospital the number of physicians sampled in each specialty was determined by the ratio of physicians in that specialty (department) to the total number of physicians in that hospital. The sample size was calculated using the sample size calculator available online. The calculator recommended a sample size of 378 and we used a larger sample size. A total of 450 physicians were selected using a random number generator. Each of these physicians was given a questionnaire and out of 450 questionnaires, 335 (response rate – 74%) were returned and 309 (69%) were deemed usable. Twenty six questionnaires that were excluded from further analysis had 30% or more of the questions (items) unanswered. The study was conducted between July 2010 and December 2010.
The questionnaire constructed for the study consisted of five constructs and all the constructs were measured using a 5-point Likert scale (5 – strongly agree; 1 – strongly disagree). The constructs were taken from established sources: Intention to use CDSS (six items), Perceived threat to professional autonomy (six items), Level of physician’s involvement in decision-making (four items), Performance expectancy (six items) and Effort expectancy (six items). Among these constructs, intention to use CDSS had two items and effort expectancy one item that were negatively worded. These items were reverse coded for further analysis. The questionnaire was constructed in English. Since the professionals in Malaysia were adept at handling English language, there was no need to translate the questionnaire to the national language of Malaysia (Bahasa Malaysia). The construct validity of the five constructs was assessed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).
Hypothesis1: There is a negative relationship between physicians’ perceived threat to professional autonomy and their intention to use the CDSS system.
The significant role of performance expectancy among physicians in shaping their intention toward using a new technology is centered on physicians’ utility-based point of view about using the technology. Performance expectancy exerts the most significant impact on physicians’ intention to use CDSS. The proposed framework hypothesizes that performance expectancy helps physicians in forming their intention to use the CDSS and is as follows:
Hypothesis2: There is a positive relationship between physicians’ performance expectancy and their intention to use the CDSS system.
Some studies have found that effort expectancy does not directly affect users’ behavioral intention to use the system and its effect can be enhanced through performance expectancy. This study hypothesizes that effort expectancy positively affects performance expectancy in accepting CDSS among healthcare professionals and is as follows:
Hypothesis3: There is a positive relationship between effort expectancy and performance expectancy in using CDSS among physicians.
The literature states that if physicians are involved in decision-making process regarding the introduction and development of appropriate IT system in organizations, they become more willing to change their long-term practice pattern and this results in lower costs and improved healthcare delivery. Physician’s high level of involvement in decision making regarding the development and implementation of CDSS can positively influence the intention to use CDSS. Based on the above arguments, we hypothesize as follows:
Hypothesis4: Physician’s level of involvement in making decisions regarding the development and implementation of CDSS is positively related to the intention to use CDSS.
Cronbach’s Alpha (CR) and Composite reliability (COMP) of constructs (diagonal of the matrix contains the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and off-diagonal elements are the squared correlations between constructs)
Results and discussion
Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
Level of familiarity with Clinical IT
Past experience in using CDSS
Type of Hospital
Descriptive statistics of constructs
Structural model results
There is a significant negative relationship between perceived threat to professional autonomy and intention to use CDSS (r (standardized coefficient) = −0.397, p-value = 0.00 < 0.05).
There is a significant positive relationship between level of involvement in decision making and intention to use new CDSS (r = 0.236, p-value= 0.00 < 0.05).
There is a significant positive relationship between performance expectancy and intention to use new CDSS (r = 0.403, p-value= 0.00 < 0.05).
There is a significant positive relationship between effort expectancy and performance expectancy (r = 0.714, p-value= 0.00 < 0.05).
Level of physicians’ involvement in decision making, performance expectancy and perceived threat to autonomy collectively explain 47% of the variance in intention to use CDSS among physicians in Malaysia.
This survey on physicians’ intention to use CDSS was undertaken on the premise that physicians are different from other IT users and popular models such as UTAUT cannot be used to predict physicians’ acceptance behavior. A physician’s decision to accept a decision support system depends upon the following factors: perceived threat to professional autonomy, level of involvement in deciding the implementation of CDSS and belief that new CDSS will improve performance. Our research reveals that physicians IT adoption behavior depends on whether or not a CDSS threatens their professional autonomy. Why should a physician feel threatened? Literature suggests several reasons for this behavior. First, the physician’s belief that the new CDSS may erode the natural flow of his/her work routines and may not follow his/her practice patterns. Second, the concern that his/her knowledge may be organized, codified and distributed to peers and other non-professionals. Third, physicians feel uncomfortable when they face regulations and instructions generated by a CDSS that advises them on what to do. Fourth, a misconception among physicians in Malaysia is that a CDSS can replace them. Consequently, the possibility of using CDSS by physicians decreases. In a developing country like Malaysia, there is a strong need for continued motivation and training for physicians for the success of CDSS implementation initiatives.
The finding that performance expectancy is positively and significantly related to intention to use new CDSS is in line with previous studies that claim performance expectancy as an important determinant of physicians’ intention to use a new technology[1, 30]. A plausible reason for a large effect of performance expectancy is rooted in the characteristics of respondents who are considered as pre-adopters. As indicated earlier, physicians in Malaysia can be considered as pre-adopters since 90% have little or no experience in using CDSS. This group focuses mainly on usefulness of CDSS and instrumental benefits that can be derived when forming their intentions to use a clinical IT. As a result, performance expectancy is positively related to physicians’ intention to use CDSS.
The results concerning the effect of effort expectancy are consistent with some research on the behavior of physicians. For instance, some studies present a positive and significant relationship between effort and performance expectancies in the healthcare context. These studies signify the role of effort expectancy to use a new IT system in obtaining more utility from the system. Based on this point of view, effort expectancy is considered as an important factor influencing physicians indirectly through performance expectancy. In light of the salient role of performance expectancy, this study shows that if physicians find the CDSS easy to use, they expect the system to be useful in increasing their productivity. Therefore, effort expectancy is found to be an antecedent for performance expectancy.
Literature states the importance of giving managerial roles to physicians. Involvement of physicians in decision-making process regarding a new CDSS includes: participation in the planning, involvement in the implementation and participation in the development. When the level of involvement for physicians notably increases, they perceive that they are a part of the process that influences implementation of a new CDSS. Under such conditions, physicians perceive themselves as active stakeholders and they become more willing to change their traditional work routine by using CDSS.
What are the lessons learnt? Implementing and using CDSS in a developing country like Malaysia can be a challenging task. A suitable electronic infrastructure is vital to the use of CDSS. Our results suggest that the hospital administrators must take following initiatives before implementing CDSS. First, the managers should realize a strong need for continued motivation and training for physicians. The training and motivation can be provided by sending physicians for short-term attachments to hospitals (local or overseas) that have successfully implemented CDSS and by sending them to relevant conferences and seminars. Second, the new CDSS must have easy features and include user-friendly elements for the physicians to perceive that using the instructions given by the system is easy and will help them attain gains in job performance. Difficulty in processing complex features of CDSS makes physicians believe that the system is not useful and is not fit for their job. The hospital management along with the physicians must study different systems before deciding the right CDSS. Third, this study recommends that hospitals’ top managers and shareholders have to pay more attention to physicians’ participation in planning, development and implementation of a new CDSS. This study suggests that physicians be made to actively participate in the decision making process. If the physicians see that they are involved in general decision making about the CDSS, the possibility of showing negative reaction becomes lower. A recent study has identified ten different themes that need attention if a clinic or community hospital plans to implement and utilize CDSS. Through our study, we propose three more themes that are relevant in hospitals in developing countries: physician’s characteristic (autonomy), physician’s involvement in developing CDSS and physician’s belief about CDSS.
From a theoretical standpoint and theory building, the research contributes to IT adoption theories explaining user’s intention to accept new technology. Our research has attempted to identify important constructs from the user acceptance literature by using the popular UTAUT as a base model. Since the UTAUT is general and cannot address physicians’ unique characteristics, this model has been improved to better explain physicians’ IT adoption behavior in a hospital setting. Our model can explain 47% of the variance in physicians’ CDSS adoption behavior. The key findings of this study are: (1) Physicians’ perceived threat to professional autonomy lowers the intention to use CDSS; (2) Physicians involvement in the planning, design and implementation increases their intention to use CDSS; and (3) Physicians belief that the new CDSS will improve his/her job performance increases their intention to use CDSS. Our study not only identified the source of resistance but also suggested strategies to improve physicians’ behavior towards CDSS acceptance. Only with greater acceptance by physicians, new technology can play a significant role in advancing health care delivery. The level of resistance to use CDSS is higher in developing countries when compared to developed countries. The administrators of public and private hospitals must understand the factors that affect CDSS adoption and must take proactive steps before implementation.
Our study had several limitations. First, the study included private and public hospitals in Malaysia. The factors influencing the implementation of CDSS in hospitals could be different in other developing countries. Second, our study considered the hospitals in and around the capital city, Kuala Lumpur, and these hospitals are advanced when compared to the facilities in the rural areas. The applicability of our results to the hospitals in the rural areas is unknown. Third, after building and testing the model, we found that only 47% of variance in adoption behavior could be explained. Even though this is higher than achieved by other studies, it is obvious that there are other factors that need to be considered.
MS supervised the study, verified the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. PE collected the data and carried out the data analysis. NK and HN helped in the supervision of the study and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors wish to thank the Ministry of Health, Malaysia for granting permission to conduct the study. The authors also thank the authorities of the hospitals and the physicians who participated in the study.
- Chang IC, Hwang HG, Hung WF, Li YC: Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl. 2007, 33 (2): 296-303. 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Durieux P, Nizard B, Bavaud P, Mounier N, Lepage E: A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism. JAMA. 2000, 283: 2816-2821. 10.1001/jama.283.21.2816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardner RM: Computerized clinical decision-support in respiratory care. Respir Care. 2004, 49 (4): 378-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ash JS, Sittig DF, Guappone AP: Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 6-10.1186/1472-6947-12-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Coiera E: The guide to health informatics. 2003, Madison Avenue, New York: Oxford University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou P: Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2009, 78 (2): 115-126. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walter Z, Lopez MS: Physicians’ Acceptance of information technology: role of perceived threat to professional autonomy. Decis Support Syst. 2008, 46 (1): 206-215. 10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ridderikhoff J, Van Herk B: Who is afraid of the system? Doctors’ attitude towards diagnostic systems. Int J Med Inform. 2000, 53: 91-100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E: Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Med Inform Assoc. 2004, 11: 104-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fraser HSF, Biondich P, Moodley D, Choi S, Mamlin BW, Szolovits P: Implementing electronic medical records in developing countries. Inform Prim Care. 2005, 13: 83-95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romano MJ, Stafford RS: Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011, 171 (10): 897-903. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tomasi E, Facchini LA, Maia MFS: Health information technology in primary health care in developing countries: a literature review. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82: 867-874.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis F: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27 (3): 425-478.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X: Communication, Networking & Broadcasting; Computing & Processing (Hardware/Software). 2011, Kauai, HI: 44th Hawaii International Conference, IEEEGoogle Scholar
- Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng OR, Tam KY: Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manag Inf Syst. 1999, 16 (2): 91-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kohli R, Piontek F, Ellington T, VanOsdol T, Shepard M, Brazel G: Managing customer relationships through E-business decision support applications: a case of hospital–physician collaboration. Decis Support Syst. 2001, 32 (2): 171-187. 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00109-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chau PYK, Hu PJ: Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J Manag Inf Syst. 2002, 18 (4): 191-229.Google Scholar
- Han S, Mustonen P, Seppanen M, Kallio M: Physicians’ acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study. Int J Mob Commun. 2006, 4 (2): 210-230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gagnon MP, Godinb G, Gagnéb C, Fortina JP, Lamothec L, Reinharza D, Cloutierd A: An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behavior to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2003, 71: 103-115. 10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00094-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Croteau AM, Vieru D: 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Telemedicine adoption by different groups of physicians. 2002, Maui: IEEE Computer SocietyView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu IL, Li JY, Fu CY: The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: an integrative perspective. Decis Support Syst. 2011, 51: 587-596. 10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Payton FC: Lesson learned from three inter-organizational health care information systems. Inf Manage. 2000, 36 (6): 311-322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shortell SM: Physician Involvement in Hospital Decision Making." The New Health Care for Profit: Doctors and Hospitals in a Competitive Environment. 1983, Washington, DC: The National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JC, Gerbing DW: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988, 103: 411-423.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fornell C, Lacker DF: Evaluating structural equation models with unobserverable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981, 18 (1): 39-50. 10.2307/3151312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2005, New York: Guilfor, 2Google Scholar
- Kritzer HM: The professions are dead, long live the professions: legal practice in a post-professional world. Law Soc Rev. 1999, 33 (3): 713-759. 10.2307/3115110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harrison S, Dowswell G, Wright J: Practice nurses and clinical guidelines in a changing primary care context: an empirical study. J Adv Nurs. 2002, 39 (3): 299-307. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02277.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ali SNS, Razali AM, Suradi NR: Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Statistical Sciences (RCSS’10). A Framework for Continuous Outpatient Health Care Delivery Improvement through Treatment Plan Support. 2010, 93-102.Google Scholar
- Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC: Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inf Manage. 2006, 43 (3): 350-363. 10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Egea JMO, González MVR: Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Hum Behav. 2011, 27: 319-332. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holsinger J, Beaton B: Physician professionalism for a new century. Clin Autonomy. 2006, 19 (5): 473-479.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/142/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.