Skip to main content

Join our Editorial Board

Become an Editorial Board Member

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is recruiting new Editorial Board Members. With an increasing visibility of the journal, we wish to expand our Editorial Board to ensure the journal is able to cope with an increasing number of submissions whilst maintaining high editorial standards.

We welcome applications from researchers with expertise in all aspects of the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health. 

We especially encourage applications from researchers focusing on the following areas:

  • Digital health technologies (telemedicine/wearable devices/virtual reality)
  • Computational simulations, modelling, machine learning
  • Data analytic methods
  • Medical imaging
  • Mobile health
  • Health systems engineering
  • Virtual healthcare

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making scope and ethos

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.

We do not make editorial decisions on the basis of the interest of a study or its likely impact. Studies must be scientifically valid; for research articles this includes a scientifically sound research question, the use of suitable methods and analysis, and following community-agreed standards relevant to the research field.

Criteria

We are interested in individuals who are committed to open access, data sharing and innovation in scientific publishing.

Suitable candidates should:

  • have a minimum of fifteen (15) research papers published in reputable, English language, peer-reviewed journals;
  • be frequently listed as corresponding author (first or last author) during the last five years;
  • have demonstrable expertise that fits within the scope and the need of the journal.

Suitable Editorial Board Members for BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making must:

  • support the journal’s ethos, scope, editorial standards, and policies, and be committed to represent BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making within the scientific community;
  • provide a professional and supportive service to our authors and ensure that manuscripts fulfil the requirements of the Journal and are handled efficiently and appropriately through peer-review.

Role and responsibilities

The Editorial Board Member is primarily responsible for assessing manuscripts for their suitability for peer review, selecting suitable reviewers who meet the Journal’s requirements and recommends decisions on the basis of the peer reviewers’ reports and their own assessment while adhering to the Journal’s editorial policies.

An Editorial Board Member for BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making should be willing to handle a minimum of twelve (12) manuscripts per year across a range of disciplines within their broader subject area.

We also encourage all of our Editors to take an active interest in journal development and promotional projects to help increase the visibility of our published research.

More information on Editorial Board Responsibilities can be found here

Interested in applying?

If you are interested in becoming an Editorial Board Member for BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and you meet the criteria above, please click on the button below to submit your application. We look forward to hearing from you.

Apply now

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact 2023
    Journal Impact Factor: 3.3
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.9
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.304
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.002

    Speed 2023
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 18
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 213

    Usage 2023
    Downloads: 2,588,758
    Altmetric mentions: 2,443

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal