Skip to main content

Articles

Page 69 of 69

  1. We conducted a review of the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The objectives were: to identify studies assessing the accuracy of clinical examination in the detection...

    Authors: Guy de Bruyn and Edward A Graviss
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:6
  2. The use of telemedicine is growing, but its efficacy for achieving comparable or improved clinical outcomes has not been established in many medical specialties. The objective of this systematic review was to ...

    Authors: William R Hersh, Mark Helfand, James Wallace, Dale Kraemer, Patricia Patterson, Susan Shapiro and Merwyn Greenlick
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:5
  3. The specificity of clinical questions is gauged by explicit descriptions of four dimensions: subjects, interventions, comparators and outcomes of interest. This study determined whether adding simple instructi...

    Authors: Elmer V Villanueva, Elizabeth A Burrows, Paul A Fennessy, Meera Rajendran and Jeremy N Anderson
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:4
  4. To determine whether a computerized clinical documentation system (CDS): 1) decreased time spent charting and increased time spent in patient care; 2) decreased medication errors; 3) improved clinical decision...

    Authors: James A Menke, Cynthia W Broner, Deborah Y Campbell, Michelle Y McKissick and Joy A Edwards-Beckett
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:3
  5. Patients increasingly seek more active involvement in health care decisions, but little is known about how to communicate complex risk information to patients. The objective of this study was to elicit patient...

    Authors: Jennifer M Fortin, Linda K Hirota, Barbara E Bond, Annette M O'Connor and Nananda F Col
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:2
  6. Developments in information technology promise to revolutionise the delivery of health care by providing access to data in a timely and efficient way. Information technology also raises several important conce...

    Authors: Ross EG Upshur and Vivek Goel
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2001 1:1

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact 2023
    Journal Impact Factor: 3.3
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.9
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.304
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.002

    Speed 2023
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 18
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 213

    Usage 2023
    Downloads: 2,588,758
    Altmetric mentions: 2,443

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal