A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors and staff of BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making would like to publicly acknowledge our peer reviewers.
Reviewer acknowledgements
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Citation Impact 2023
Journal Impact Factor: 3.3
5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.9
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.304
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.002
Speed 2023
Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 18
Submission to acceptance (median days): 213
Usage 2023
Downloads: 2,588,758
Altmetric mentions: 2,443
Peer-review Terminology
-
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication