Skip to main content

Volume 13 Supplement 3

Articles from the Eisenberg Center Conference Series 2012: Supporting informed decision making when clinical evidence and conventional wisdom collide

Proceedings

Edited by Robert J Volk, Richard Street Jr, Quentin W Smith and Michael C Fordis

The publication of this supplement was funded by Eisenberg Center contract number HHSA 290-2008-10015-C. Articles have undergone the journal's standard review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.

Articles from the Eisenberg Center Conference Series 2012: Supporting informed decision making when clinical evidence and conventional wisdom collide. Go to conference site.

Rockville, MD, USA13 September 2012

  1. Americans devote more resources to health care than any other developed country, and yet they have worse health outcomes and less access. This creates a perfect set of opportunities for Consumer Reports, a nonpro...

    Authors: John S Santa
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 3):S2
  2. In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released new mammography screening guidelines that sparked a torrent of criticism. The subsequent conflict was significant and pitted the Task Force against oth...

    Authors: Jakob D Jensen, Melinda Krakow, Kevin K John and Miao Liu
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 3):S4
  3. Over the past 30 years, patients’ options for accessing information about prescription drugs have expanded dramatically. In this narrative review, we address four questions: (1) What information sources are pa...

    Authors: Richard L Kravitz and Robert A Bell
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 3):S5
  4. Informed decision making requires that those individuals making health and health-care decisions understand the advantages and disadvantages associated with particular health options. Research and theory sugge...

    Authors: Vetta L Sanders Thompson
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 3):S7

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    3.298 - 2-year Impact Factor (2021)
    3.894 - 5-year Impact Factor (2021)
    1.387 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    0.833 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    Speed
    43 days to first decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    88 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only (Median)

    Usage 
    2,056,778 Downloads (2021)
    1,628 Altmetric mentions (2021)

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal