Volume 13 Supplement 3
Edited by Robert J Volk, Richard Street Jr, Quentin W Smith and Michael C Fordis
The publication of this supplement was funded by Eisenberg Center contract number HHSA 290-2008-10015-C. Articles have undergone the journal's standard review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.
Articles from the Eisenberg Center Conference Series 2012: Supporting informed decision making when clinical evidence and conventional wisdom collide. Go to conference site.
Rockville, MD, USA13 September 2012
Americans devote more resources to health care than any other developed country, and yet they have worse health outcomes and less access. This creates a perfect set of opportunities for Consumer Reports, a nonpro...
Health care news stories have the potential to inform and educate news consumers and health-care consumers about the tradeoffs involved in health-care decisions about treatments, tests, products, and procedure...
In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released new mammography screening guidelines that sparked a torrent of criticism. The subsequent conflict was significant and pitted the Task Force against oth...
Over the past 30 years, patients’ options for accessing information about prescription drugs have expanded dramatically. In this narrative review, we address four questions: (1) What information sources are pa...
Clinicians are encouraged to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) as well as patient-centered medicine. At times, these paradigms seem to be mutually exclusive and difficult to reconcile. It can become even ...
Informed decision making requires that those individuals making health and health-care decisions understand the advantages and disadvantages associated with particular health options. Research and theory sugge...
Citation Impact
3.298 - 2-year Impact Factor (2021)
3.894 - 5-year Impact Factor (2021)
1.387 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
0.833 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)
Speed
48 days to first decision for all manuscripts (Median)
72 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only (Median)
Usage
2,263,856 Downloads (2022)
1,628 Altmetric mentions (2021)
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication