Skip to main content

Volume 13 Supplement 2

The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration"s Quality Dimensions: Theoretical Rationales, Current Evidence, and Emerging Issues

Reviews

Edited by Robert Volk, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Dawn Stacey and Glyn Elwyn

Publication of this supplement was partially funded by an unrestricted grant from the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. Details of the remaining publication funding can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplement articles. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.

The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration's Quality Dimensions: Theoretical Rationales, Current Evidence, and Emerging Issues.

  1. In 2003, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration was established to enhance the quality and effectiveness of patient decision aids by establishing an evidence-informed framework ...

    Authors: Robert J Volk, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Dawn Stacey and Glyn Elwyn
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S1
    Content type: Introduction Published on:

  2. The original version of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) recommended that patient decision aids (PtDAs) should be carefully developed, user-tested and open to scrutiny, with a well-docu...

    Authors: Angela Coulter, Diana Stilwell, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Chirk Jenn Ng and Trudy van der Weijden
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S2
    Content type: Review Published on:

  3. In 2005, the International Patient Decisions Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration developed quality criteria for patient decisions aids; one of the quality dimensions dealt with disclosure of conflicts of inter...

    Authors: Michael J Barry, Evelyn Chan, Benjamin Moulton, Sunita Sah, Magenta B Simmons and Clarence Braddock
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S3
    Content type: Review Published on:

  4. Legal, ethical, and psychological arguments indicate that patients need to receive information about their health situations before their care decisions are made. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are designed to ...

    Authors: Deb Feldman-Stewart, Mary Ann O’Brien, Marla L Clayman, B Joyce Davison, Masahito Jimbo, Michel Labrecque, Richard W Martin and Heather Shepherd
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S4
    Content type: Review Published on:

  5. Patients and clinicians expect patient decision aids to be based on the best available research evidence. Since 2005, this expectation has translated into a quality dimension of the International Patient Decis...

    Authors: Victor M Montori, Annie LeBlanc, Angela Buchholz, Diana L Stilwell and Apostolos Tsapas
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S5
    Content type: Review Published on:

  6. Standards for patient decision aids require that information and options be presented in a balanced manner; this requirement is based on the argument that balanced presentation is essential to foster informed ...

    Authors: Purva Abhyankar, Robert J Volk, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Paulina Bravo, Angela Buchholz, Elissa Ozanne, Dale Colins Vidal, Nananda Col and Peep Stalmeier
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S6
    Content type: Review Published on:

  7. Making evidence-based decisions often requires comparison of two or more options. Research-based evidence may exist which quantifies how likely the outcomes are for each option. Understanding these numeric est...

    Authors: Lyndal J Trevena, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Adrian Edwards, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Mirta Galesic, Paul KJ Han, John King, Margaret L Lawson, Suzanne K Linder, Isaac Lipkus, Elissa Ozanne, Ellen Peters, Danielle Timmermans and Steven Woloshin
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S7
    Content type: Review Published on:

  8. Consensus guidelines have recommended that decision aids include a process for helping patients clarify their values. We sought to examine the theoretical and empirical evidence related to the use of values cl...

    Authors: Angela Fagerlin, Michael Pignone, Purva Abhyankar, Nananda Col, Deb Feldman-Stewart, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Carrie A Levin, Arwen H Pieterse, Valerie Reyna, Anne Stiggelbout, Laura D Scherer, Celia Wills and Holly O Witteman
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S8
    Content type: Review Published on:

  9. Patient decision aids support people to make informed decisions between healthcare options. Personal stories provide illustrative examples of others’ experiences and are seen as a useful way to communicate inf...

    Authors: Hilary L Bekker, Anna E Winterbottom, Phyllis Butow, Amanda J Dillard, Deb Feldman-Stewart, Floyd J Fowler, Maria L Jibaja-Weiss, Victoria A Shaffer and Robert J Volk
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S9
    Content type: Review Published on:

  10. Effective use of a patient decision aid (PtDA) can be affected by the user’s health literacy and the PtDA’s characteristics. Systematic reviews of the relevant literature can guide PtDA developers to attend to...

    Authors: Kirsten J McCaffery, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Sian K Smith, David Rovner, Don Nutbeam, Marla L Clayman, Karen Kelly-Blake, Michael S Wolf and Stacey L Sheridan
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S10
    Content type: Review Published on:

  11. Coaching and guidance are structured approaches that can be used within or alongside patient decision aids (PtDAs) to facilitate the process of decision making. Coaching is provided by an individual, and guida...

    Authors: Dawn Stacey, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Jeff Belkora, B Joyce Davison, Marie-Anne Durand, Karen B Eden, Aubri S Hoffman, Mirjam Koerner, France Légaré, Marie-Chantal Loiselle and Richard L Street Jr
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S11
    Content type: Review Published on:

  12. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDA) requires evidence that PtDAs improve the quality of the decision-making process and the quality of the choice made, or decision quality. The aim of t...

    Authors: Karen R Sepucha, Cornelia M Borkhoff, Joanne Lally, Carrie A Levin, Daniel D Matlock, Chirk Jenn Ng, Mary E Ropka, Dawn Stacey, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Celia E Wills and Richard Thomson
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S12
    Content type: Review Published on:

  13. In 2005, the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration identified twelve quality dimensions to guide assessment of patient decision aids. One dimension—the delivery of patient decision aids o...

    Authors: Aubri S Hoffman, Robert J Volk, Anton Saarimaki, Christine Stirling, Linda C Li, Martin Härter, Geetanjali R Kamath and Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S13
    Content type: Review Published on:

  14. Two decades of research has established the positive effect of using patient-targeted decision support interventions: patients gain knowledge, greater understanding of probabilities and increased confidence in...

    Authors: Glyn Elwyn, Isabelle Scholl, Caroline Tietbohl, Mala Mann, Adrian GK Edwards, Catharine Clay, France Légaré, Trudy van der Weijden, Carmen L Lewis, Richard M Wexler and Dominick L Frosch
    Citation: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013 13(Suppl 2):S14
    Content type: Review Published on:
Submit manuscript

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    3.298 - 2-year Impact Factor (2021)
    3.894 - 5-year Impact Factor (2021)
    1.387 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    0.833 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    Speed
    48 days to first decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    72 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only (Median)

    Usage 
    2,263,856 Downloads (2022)
    1,628 Altmetric mentions (2021)

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Follow

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us