Skip to main content

Effectiveness of PUSH notifications from a mobile app for improving the body composition of overweight or obese women: a protocol of a three-armed randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

The penetration level of mobile technology has grown exponentially and is part of our lifestyle, at all levels. The use of the smartphone has opened up a new horizon of possibilities in the treatment of health, not in vain, around 40% of existing applications are linked to the mHealth segment. Taking advantage of this circumstance to study new approaches in the treatment of obesity and prescription of physical activity is growing interest in the field of health. The primary outcome (obese adult women) will be assessed according to age, fitness status, weight, and body composition status. Data will be collected at enrollment and weekly during 6 months of intervention on dietary practices, physical activity, anthropometry, and body composition. Analysis of effect will be performed comparing the outcomes between intervention and control arms. The message delivery is in progress.

Methods

A 3-arm clinical trial was established. A series of quantitative and qualitative measures were used to evaluate the effects of self-weighing and the establishment of objectives to be reached concerning the prescription of physical activity. At the end of this pilot study, a set of appropriate measures and procedures were identified and agreed upon to determine the effectiveness of messaging in the form of PUSH technology. The results were recorded and analyzed to begin a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Conclusions

The study is anticipated to establish feasibility of using PUSH notifications to evaluate whether or not an intervention of 6 months, directed by a team formed by Dietician-Nutritionist and nursing professionals, by means of an application for Smartphone and a personal consultation, improves the body composition of adult women with a fat percentage equal to or higher than 30% at the beginning of the study.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials ID: NCT03911583. First Submitted: April 9, 2019. Ethical oversight is provided by the Bioethical Committee of Córdoba University and registered in the platform clinicaltrials.gov. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and analysis data will be made public.

Peer Review reports

Background

The use of mobile technology and its presence in our daily lives is increasing exponentially. It has been estimated that, in 2019, worldwide, there will be more than 2700 million Smartphone users, and around 1400 million Tablet owners [1]. Also, the technical improvements in mobile devices, including larger displays and a higher resolution, an increase in surfing speeds and the development of an infinity of applications (APP) with a multitude of new functions [2], has signified an authentic social and cultural revolution, reaching all society levels. As a result, the incorporation of mobile technology into our daily habits has triggered changes in the way that we live, in our work, or in how we communicate and relate to each other socially [3].

According to the Global System Mobile Association (GSMA), there are more devices connected to the network than people in the world. In 2017, 7422 million mobile connections were identified, whereas the world population census was of 7228 million [4]. Another relevant fact that helps to size up the magnitude of this technological tendency is that, in 2014, the number of accesses and browsing time in the web through mobile devices exceeded, for the first time, those made by office desk equipment [3, 5,6,7]. The future of technology and the mobile phone are considered to be on equal terms, making it very difficult to distinguish between one and the other. Thus, it is believed that, in a few years, we shall be able to dispense with the adjective “mobile” when speaking about technologies as they will all have this characteristic [3].

The term mHealth (mobile health) was used and defined for the first time in 2000 [8]. This concept was subsequently employed in the 2010 mHealth Summit of the Foundation for National Institutes of Health (FNIH) to refer to “the provision of medical attention services through mobile communication devices” [9] and nowadays this is globally understood as a medical and public health practice based on the use of mobile devices [10]. Since then, up to now, around 40% of the over 300,000 applications available in the different apps stores are related to health themes, with those focused on the monitoring and management of diseases standing out [11]. Different strategies, going from phone calls or sending information through the Short Message Service (SMS), up to the use of applications such as those for clinical decision-making support or telemedicine, have shown themselves to be effective in the communication between patients and health professionals; the change toward healthy lifestyles (giving up smoking or increasing physical exercise); in the improvement of illness management (in diabetes or asthma, for instance); and in the increase in adherence to the treatments [12,13,14,15].

One of the characteristics of mobile applications is the sending and receiving of messages through a system of notifications known as “PUSH,” that consists of requests appearing on the display of the Smartphone at a scheduled time, permitting them to be customizable both in their contents and at the time of sending them. Their principal difference from SMS lies in the fact that the latter are asynchronous, i.e., it is not expected or required for the recipient to answer a message. However, PUSH notifications are pro-active as they offer visual or aural alerts to inform the recipient of a message or event received and invite them to act on them [16]. On receiving the notification, the user can interact in different degrees, from merely reading it to answering it, thus permitting feedback. Also, there is evidence of the PUSH notifications being effective in communications between professionals [17].

SMSs have demonstrated that they are an excellent resource for delivering electronic reminders in practice and a very feasible platform, being useful in increasing adherence to treatment [18], preventing complications in non-communicable diseases [19], facilitating inter-professional communication [20], and helping in disease self-management [21]. PUSH notifications (defined as an event-based mechanism where remote servers “push”/CONVEY events to Smartphone client apps) [22] has recently appeared in mhealth, showing its potential for improving pervasive functionalities in mobile health apps, allowing the delivery of timely updates and customized reminders to users or patients. One of the essential functionalities is to offer alerts to inform the user about a received message and invite him/her to act, even without needing to be the app being used [23]. Although this strategy has proved to be effective in communication with professionals [17] and assessing patterns of health behaviors [24], there is scarce evidence of its effectiveness in interventions aimed at changing lifestyles.

Interventions that use mobile and portable technologies can be useful in improving healthy habits or reducing high levels of sedentary behavior [25, 26]. It has been demonstrated that certain functions implicit in the habitual use of Smartphones, like the exchanging of information, the possibility of carrying out self-monitoring with natural, intuitive record systems, the interaction between users, or the employment of gamification strategies, also have positive effects on the health status [27].

Besides, the users should feel that they are part of the technology, it is especially important to involve patients in active commitments, like self-assessment in certain behaviours, or making timely follow-ups [28]. These measures have been seen to be efficacious in improving health markers, for example, weight management, and blood pressure [29].

The objective of a large part of the health interventions based on the use of APPs has been to improve nutritional status through dietary advice and an increase in physical activity (PA) [30]. In this sense, it has become evident that an increase in PA implies benefits to health and reduces mortality from all causes, regardless of the body mass index (BMI) [31]. Also, there is ample evidence of the role of PA in weight loss programs in the long-term prevention of recovering weight loss [32]. In past years, systematic reviews have been done in order to establish associations between physical activity and weight loss in overweight or obese individuals [33, 34], demonstrating the existence of an inverse association between the physical activity carried out and the BMI.

In this study, we aim to investigate whether mHealth that included text messages via PUSH notifications containing advice for dietary and lifestyle modifications for six months would reduce the percentage of total body fat among overweight or obese women adults aged 25–64 years in a predominantly urban Southern Spain population. The study also aims to evaluate the effects of the mHealth intervention on body mass index, dietary practices, and physical activity. As an initial hypothesis, we considered that those subjects assigned to the group receiving the PUSH notifications would adhere to the dietary recommendations and physical activity proposed, thus achieving a more significant fat loss and a higher increase in muscle mass.

Methods/design

Study design

A controlled randomized three-armed clinical trial was conducted that includes a physical activity lasting six months in women following the same dietary prescription. The groups were differentiated based on whether or not they received Push notifications from a mobile application (Nutrición Sur version 15.0.0). Thus, the control group did not receive these notifications, whereas the women who received them constitute an experimental group. Additionally, inside each group, three different subgroups were randomly established with distinct degrees of physical activity (PA) intensity; these could be light (LPA), moderate (MPA), or intense (IPA).

Sample size calculation

The primary outcome variable was fat mass loss after six months, and the anticipated minimum difference in the average fat mass loss was 2%, with an expected SD not exceeding 3.5% [35]. The study was designed to have at least an 80% power and an alpha level set at 0.5, obtaining a sample size of 27 individuals for each group (total N = 54). A total of 90 women (45 for each group), was estimated, to mitigate the effect of possible dropouts during this trial.

Eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion)

The women with the following pathologies or special situations was excluded from the study: Type 2 Diabetes, being or trying to become pregnant, being in a maternal lactation period, suffering from kidney failure, being under age, presenting a healthy weight (BMI ≤ 25) or receiving pharmacological antidepressant treatment. Women not possessing smartphones with Android or iOS operating systems and those without available data connections did not participate in the study.

Also, with the aim of homogenizing the study population, the inclusion criteria were: having a body fat percentage of ≥30%, being sedentary, defined as low energy sitting (or reclining) during waking hours [36], and not having been submitted to a restrictive diet in the 6 months prior to the beginning of the study. The flow chart of the participants is found in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow chart of the participants

Study variables and measurements

PUSH notifications

Figure 2 shows the implementation of the PUSH notifications in the study design. Automatic PUSH notifications were scheduled to be sent on specific days, or not, with personalized health and motivation messages, which was aimed to provide comments for reinforcing behavior modification and encouraging interaction with the APP. These comments were based on the following behavioral theories:

  • Health tips, where the primary tailoring goals were: attention and peripheral processing [37].

  • Physical Activity Tips, in this case: attention and being informed [38].

  • Self-monitoring tips, where the primary tailoring goals were: decision making and behavioral intention [39].

Fig. 2
figure2

Implementation of the PUSH notifications in the study design

Three specific times were established throughout the day for the sending of messages. According to previous works [38, 39], the best time for sending PUSH notifications was depended on: a) when patients were able to fix their preferred time for receiving them, b) trying to deliver them at times that did not interrupt the daily routine (notifications were more effective) [40]. For these reasons, it was determined that the best adherence was achieved at the times of day at which there were no commitments (before work, during lunch, before supper), so we fixed for 8.30 a.m. (point 1), 14.00 p.m. (point 2) and 20.00 p.m. (point 3). The first message was sent between points 1 and 2, and those users who do not answer it again received an automated notification in point 3.

The App Nutrición Sur (Fig. 3) sent automatic notifications (see architecture in Fig. 4) programmed to receive on concrete days, with personalized messages on health and motivation. The contents of the messages were extracted from a previously established library that is consistent with advice related to food consumption and physical activity. This section aimed to stimulate and remind the patient about the protocol assigned, encourage her to complete a specific steps objective (that she should be reported in the App), or carry out a session at her sports center. Also, the App included a Self-monitoring menu in which the patient could give her opinion on the diet proposed, on doing the physical activity prescribed and on her body weight, measured on home scales. The objective was to determine the effect of the PUSH notifications on compliance with the intervention protocols, as well as the changes in body composition. The information supplied in the two previous measures appeared in real-time on the researcher’s internet control panel.

Fig. 3
figure3

Screenshot of the APP developed for the research project (Nutrición Sur version 15.0.0)

Fig. 4
figure4

PUSH notifications architecture

Body composition

The percentage of body fat (BF), muscle mass (MM), and the percentage of water (W), considered to be result variables, were monitored and collected throughout the time by previously validated multifrequency bioelectrical impedance (BWB-800A, Tanita Corp. USA) [41]. This method is based on a 3-compartment model capable of evaluating BF, MM, and bone mineral content. Also, the percentage difference of each dependent variable was calculated throughout the weekly consultations, taking as a reference that recorded in the first one.

Likewise, the following independent variables were noted: age (years), height (cm), weight (Kg), and BMI (Kg/m2). The anthropometric measurements were taken following the recommendations in the standardized anthropometry handbook [42] by experienced personnel to diminish the coefficient of variation. Each measurement was taken three times, calculating the mean value. All the quantitative variables were measured with a precision of 0.1. For the height, a stadiometer (SECA 213) was used.

Physical activity

The strata proposed by Matthews [43] to evaluate the physical activity was employed. The MPA and IPA patients received instructions for doing aerobic exercises corresponding to a training-induced energy expenditure of approximately 300 to 600 kcal/day, while those relating to the LPA group did not receive any instructions in this respect. For the activity of MPA subjects, the women walked between 30 and 60 min daily or carry out a volume of steps of between 7500 and 10,000. To be considered as IPA individuals, the patients must undertake three times a week, intense physical activity sessions, above 70% of VO2max. Their heart rate (HR) was calculated using the Karvonen formula [44], and the maximum HR determined by the formula: 220 – age (years). Adherence was monitored by weekly exercise records completed by participants and researchers. In the MPA group, the controls were made by installing a pedometer (ACCUPEDO) via a mobile telephone application. The patient had to show her records weekly. The IPA group patients trained in the facilities of any sports center of their choice and can select among a variety of intense PA programs (CrossFit or Body Pump), which they visited three times a week, as well as completing the same steps objective of the MPAs.

Diet pattern

Concerning diet, the daily energy requirements was determined by estimating energy expenditure while at rest through the formula proposed by Harris-Benedict (655.0955 + 9.5634 [Weight (kg)] + 1.8496 [Height (cm)] – 4.6756 [Age (years)] [45] and multiplying the value obtained by a factor of 1.5 in those patients who were performing physical activities [46]. All the participants followed a dietary regime for 24 weeks with the following allocation of macronutrients: 25–30% proteins, 40–45% carbohydrates, and 30–35% fats. A hypocaloric diet was designed with a reduction of 500 kcal/day during the treatment period to obtain a weekly weight loss of 400 g. No vitamins or other nutritional complements are prescribed. After being included in the study, each woman took part in a 1-h seminar, in which a Dietitian-Nutritionist instructs them on the suitable selection and preparation of food. The menu proposed will be valid for seven days. The energy and nutritional supply were evaluated by the program Dietowin® and the weighing method [47].

The follow-up tests began the first week that the diet and physical activity were assigned. The body composition was measured after the night fast. Patients attempted to the clinic on the same day of the week, at the same time, and to wear the same clothes. The revision appointments continued at a weekly frequency up to week 24.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative variables were presented with the mean and the standard deviation, whereas the qualitative ones in frequencies and percentages. To contrast, the goodness of fit to a normal distribution of data from quantitative variables, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction was used. For the bivariant hypothesis contrast, the two-means Student-t test was made, while, for the qualitative variables, the Chi-test and Fisher’s exact test was performed when necessary. Likewise, for the three or more means analysis, the ANOVA repeated means test was used to evaluate the effects of the intervention at the baseline moment, at 3 and 6 months, and the correlation between the quantitative variables was verified by Pearson’s (r) correlation coefficient. The ANCOVA analysis of covariance was applied to determine the effect of the baseline data on the modification of body composition. Finally, in the case of not fulfilling the criterion of normality or homoscedasticity, the non-parametric versions of the tests mentioned were conducted. Adjusted linear regressions were made for each variable of the body composition (%BF and MM) and the weight at the final moment of the study to estimate the standardized Beta coefficients possessed by the PUSH notifications in the achievement of objectives. For all the statistical analyses, an alpha error probability of under 5% (p < 0.05) was accepted, and the confidence interval calculated with a 95% security. For the statistical analysis, the computer program IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 will be used.

Discussion

The general objective of this protocol was to evaluate (1) the efficacy of PUSH notifications in an intervention aimed at improving the body composition of adult women who are overweight or obese, through dietary intervention, (2) analyzed the evolution of body composition based on PUSH notifications and prescribed physical activity. The intervention was evaluated through a randomized three-armed clinical test. It has been seen in the literature that the results of actions using mobile messaging via Push notifications could improve the degree of adherence to dietary prescriptions and physical activity, with different results. A significant number of women present physical activity levels below the minimum threshold recommend by official organizations. This sedentary lifestyle causes gains in total body weight and body fat. If the results of the assay demonstrate a positive effect, a new approach will be established based on the interaction of an APP and personal consultation, helping health professionals to establish real objectives in the prescription of physical activity and its follow-up in the patients who carry them out.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current protocol.

Abbreviations

APP:

Applications

BF:

Body fat

BMI:

Body mass index

IPA:

Intense physical activity

LPA:

Light physical activity

MM:

Muscle mass

MPA:

Moderate physical activity

PA:

Physical activity

W:

Water

References

  1. 1.

    Porter J, Huggins C, Truby H, Collins J. The effect of using mobile technology-based methods that record food or nutrient intake on diabetes control and nutrition outcomes: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2016;8(12):815. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8120815.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thurnheer SE, Gravestock I, Pichierri G, Steurer J, Burgstaller JM. Benefits of Mobile apps in pain management: systematic review. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6(10):e11231. https://doi.org/10.2196/11231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alonso-Arévalo J, Mirón-Canelo JA. Aplicaciones móviles en salud: potencial, normativa de seguridad y regulación. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED). 2017;28(3):1–13 ISSN 2307-2113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gazdecki A. 9 Mobile Technology Trends For 2017 (Infographic). Bizness Apps. 2016 [citado 20 de septiembre de 2017]. Available in: https://www.biznessapps.com/blog/mobile-technology-trends/ [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  5. 5.

    Eurostat. Digital economy and society statistics - households and individuals 2016. Available in: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ statistics-explained/index.php/Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  6. 6.

    Eurostat. Mobile connection to internet 2016. Available in: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/ Mobile_connection_to_internet [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  7. 7.

    Eurostat. 2016. Internet use by individuals Available in: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7771139/ 9–20122016-BP-EN.pdf/f023d81a-dce2–4959-93e3-8cc7082b6edd [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  8. 8.

    Istepanian R, Laxminaryan S. UNWIRED, the next generation of wireless and internetable telemedicine systems-editorial pape. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2000;4:189–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Molina-Recio G, García-Herenández L, Molina-Luque R, Salas-Morera L. The role of interdisciplinary research team in the impact of health apps in health and computer science publications: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):S77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0185-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Torgan C (November 6, 2009). The mHealth Summit: Local & global Converged. Available in Caroltorgam.com. [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  11. 11.

    Business Insider. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science Study: Impact of Digital Health Grows as Innovation, Evidence and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps Accelerate 2017. Available in https://tinyurl.com/y7qamjat [Accessed 15 Noviembre 2018].

  12. 12.

    Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by MobileTelephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(2):165–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas AE. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemedicine E-Health. 2009;15(3):231–40. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2008.0099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev. 2012;32(1):56–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxq004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, et al. The effectiveness of Mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Iqbal, S. T., and Bailey, B. P. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proc. CHI ‘08, ACM (2008). doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357070.

  17. 17.

    Pielot M, Church K, de Oliveira R. An In-situ Study of Mobile Phone Notifications. 2014 Presented at: 16th international conference on human-computer interaction with Mobile devices & services 233–242 (ACM); September 23–26, 2014; Toronto, ON, Canada doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628364

  18. 18.

    Thakkar J, Kurup R, Laba TL, Santo K, Thiagalingam A, Rodgers A, et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):340–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Redfern J, Thiagalingam A, Jan S, Whittaker R, Hackett ML, Mooney J, et al. Development of a set of mobile phone text messages designed for prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(4):492–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312449416.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hao W, Hsu Y, Chen K, Li H, Iqbal U, Nguyen P, et al. LabPush: a pilot study of providing remote clinics with laboratory results via short message service (SMS) in Swaziland. Africa CMPB. 2015;118(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Casillas J, Goyal A, Bryman J, Alquaddoomi F, Ganz P, Lidington E, et al. Development of a text messaging system to improve receipt of survivorship care in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(4):505–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0609-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Leightley D, Puddephatt JA, Jones N, Mahmoodi T, Chui Z, Field M, et al. A smartphone app and personalized text messaging framework (InDEx) to monitor and reduce alcohol use in ex-serving personnel: development and feasibility study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 6(9):e10074. https://doi.org/10.2196/10074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Iqbal S, Bailey B. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proc. CHI ‘08, ACM. 2008. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357070].

  24. 24.

    Gill S, Panda S. A smartphone app reveals erratic diurnal eating patterns in humans that can be modulated for health benefits. Cell Metab. 2015;22(5):789–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Armanasco AA, Miller YD, Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL. Preventive health behavior changes text message interventions: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stephenson A, McDonough SM, Murphy MH, Nugent CD, Mair JL. Using computer, mobile and wearable technology enhanced interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0561-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Klasnja PW. Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(1):184–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Falk E, O'Donnell MB, Cascio CN, Tinney F, Kang Y, Lieberman MD, et al. Self-affirmation alters the brain's response to health messages and subsequent behavior change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(7):1977–82. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500247112.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Krebs P, Duncan D. Health app use among US Mobile phone owners: a National Survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(4):e101. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Van der Weegen S, Verwey R, Spreeuwenberg M, Tange H, Van der Weijden T, de Witte L. The development of a Mobile monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity of people with a chronic disease in primary care: a user-centered design. JMU. 2013;101(2):2. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vaughn W, Barry MB, Beets MW, Durstine JL, Liu J, Blair SN. Fitness vs. Fatness on All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):382–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2013.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Clark JE. Diet, exercise or diet with exercise: comparing the effectiveness of treatment options for weight-loss and changes in fitness for adults (18-65 years old) who are overfat, or obese; systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;14:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-015-0154-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Besson H, Ekelund U, Luan J, May AM, Sharp S, Travier N, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of physical activity and obesity indicators in European participants of the EPIC-PANACEA study. Int J Obesity. 2009;33:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Golubic R, Ekelund U, Wijndaele K, et al. Rate of weight gain predicts change in physical activity levels: a longitudinal analysis of the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Int J Obes. 2012;37(3):404–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Newton R, Carter L, Johnson W, Zhang D, Larrivee S, Kennedy B, et al. A Church-based weight loss intervention in African American adults using text messages (LEAN study): cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(8):e256. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Campbell M, DeVellis B, Strecher V, Ammerman A, DeVellis R, Sandler RS. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(5):783–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.5.783.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bull F, Kreuter M, Scharff D. Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36(2):181–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Walther J, Pingree S, Hawkins R, Buller D. Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(3):e33. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.3.e33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bentley F, Tollmar K. The power of mobile notifications to increase wellbeing logging behavior. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM; 2013.

  41. 41.

    Schubert MM, Seay RF, Spain KK, Clarke HE, Taylor J. Reliability and validity of various laboratory methods of body composition assessment in young adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Oct 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, et al. Circumferences. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Campaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1991. p. 44–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Matthew CE. Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S512–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Karvonen J, Vuorimaa T. Heart rate and exercise intensity during sports activities. Pract Application Sports Med. 1988;5:303. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198805050-00002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of the basal metabolism in man. In: Washington Cío, ed. Publication no 279. Washington, DC: 1919 PMC1091498.

  46. 46.

    Segal KR, Edano A, Abalos A, Albu J, Blando L, Tomas MB, Pi-Sunyer FX. Effect of exercise training on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in lean, obese, and diabetic men. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71(6):2402–11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1991.71.6.2402.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dietowin® 8.0. ©1991–2015 Dietowin SL, Barcelona, España.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AHR, GMR, RML, conceived and contributed to the design of the protocol. AHR, created the architecture system and original interface. AHR, GMR, RML, contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. AHR, GMR, RML, MRS, FCM, RMR, drafted, made critical contributions to the manuscript including revisions and agreed the final version. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hernández-Reyes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol complies with the Declaration of Helsinki for medical studies and has been approved by the Bioethical Committee of Córdoba University and registered in the platform clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03911583). This research also has the permission of the Córdoba Bioethical Committee, in the Department of Health at the Regional Government of Andalusia (Act no. 284, ref. 4156).

All the patients will be informed, verbally and in writing, about the objectives of the study, and an informed consent obtained from them in accordance with the regulation in force. Patients must sign the consent accepting the conditions of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Reyes, A., Molina-Recio, G., Molina-Luque, R. et al. Effectiveness of PUSH notifications from a mobile app for improving the body composition of overweight or obese women: a protocol of a three-armed randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20, 40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1058-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • mHealth
  • Obesity
  • Weight management
  • Physical activity