Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
| 24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 12 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence |
| 12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
| 15 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 26 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 30 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 30 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.