Peer Review reports
From: Deep learning model for differentiating nasal cavity masses based on nasal endoscopy images
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Dec 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
17 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
6 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae Hoon Kim |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae Hoon Kim |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
8 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
11 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
14 Apr 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae Hoon Kim |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Apr 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae Hoon Kim |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
17 Apr 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
29 May 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-024-02517-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.