Type | Progression criterion | Measures used | Assessment of whether criterion has been met |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | Patients can successfully use the activity module. | System adherence. Technical support required. | Activity coach adherence\( \ge \) 60% (median of population) After the first week of use, < 20% of study participants need to contact technical support |
The activity module features work as intended. | User feedback from interviews. | The result from the interviews was that the information material in the Activity coach was deemed relevant. The goal-setting function did not cause negative stress in > 20% of patients. | |
Feasibility of outcomes | Accelerometer is used enough to constitute data-source for primary outcome. | Data stored in the accelerometers. | > 80% of study participants use the accelerometer for ≥ 4 days/week, with a minimum wear time of 540 min/day. |
Goal-attainment outcome feasible. | At baseline, each study participant will together with the researcher define goals to achieve. | It was feasible with a reasonable amount of effort to define two goals per patient. Goals were connected to the implemented mechanisms of change. |