Patient values in patient-provider communication about participation in early phase clinical cancer trials: a qualitative analysis before and after implementation of an online value clarification tool intervention

Table 3 Patient characteristics

Subject	Decided to participate (yes/no)	Gender	Age	Primary tumour location	Oncologist	Duration of consultation (minutes)	Used OnVaCT before consultation (yes/no)
Pre-intervention, usual care/before implementation of the OnVaCT
01	No	Female	59	Colorectal/anal	A	28	N/A
02	No	Male	66	Oesophageal/stomach	B	49	N/A
03	No	Male	69	Oesophageal/stomach	C	41	N/A
04	No	Female	62	Urinary tract	D	33	N/A
05	Yes	Female	75	Gynaecological	C	45	N/A
06	Yes	Male	66	Urinary tract	D	53	N/A
07	Yes	Male	58	Lung/mesothelioma	B	20	N/A
08	Yes	Male	72	Urinary tract	A	38	N/A
09	No	Female	50	Gynaecological	E	35	N/A
10	Yes	Male	54	Melanoma/skin	F	51	N/A
11	Yes	Female	39	Other	G	39	N/A
12	No	Male	53	Colorectal/anal	H	32	N/A
13	Yes	Male	61	Oesophageal/stomach	E	32	N/A
14	No	Female	53	Colorectal/anal	F	50	N/A
15	Yes	Male	78	Lung/mesothelioma	H	36	N/A
16	Yes	Male	72	Lung/mesothelioma	I	34	N/A
17	No	Male	72	Colorectal/anal	I	28	N/A
Post-intervention, after implementation of the OnVaCT
18	No	Male	58	Other	C	42	Yes
19	No	Female	69	Colorectal/anal	B	43	Yes
20	Yes	Female	62	Colorectal/anal	B	32	No
21	No	Male	76	Other	A	29	Yes
22	Yes	Male	51	Other	A	29	Yes
23	Yes	Male	62	Oesophageal/stomach	D	44	Yes^a
24	Yes	Female	42	Gynaecological	C	45	Yes
25	No	Male	73	Urinary tract	D	45	Yes^a
26	Yes	Female	60	Oesophageal/stomach	E	30	Yes^a
27	No	Female	50	Colorectal/anal	H	30	Yes^a
28	No	Male	74	Oesophageal/stomach	F	28	Yes^a
29	No	Male	68	Urinary tract	G	41	Yes^a
30	Yes	Female	36	Gynaecological	F	28	No^b
31	No	Male	65	Colorectal/anal	I	34	Yes^a
32	Yes	Female	55	Colorectal/anal	I	50	Yes

^a These patients filled out questions about the OnVaCT for another part of the project, but whether they had actually used it was not explicitly mentioned during the consultation
^b This patient did not fill out questions about the OnVaCT for another part of the project, and whether she had actually used it was not explicitly mentioned during the consultation

ISSN: 1472-6947