Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of included studies

From: Precision cancer medicine and the doctor-patient relationship: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Qualitative studies

Author (year)

Country

Main topic

Design/method

Participants (n)

Cancer field

Abe (2017) [24]

USA

Genomics-informed treatment decisions for radiation therapy

Semi-structured stakeholder meetings

Patients, surgeons, oncologists, industry representatives, biomedical informatics. N = 22

Prostate cancer

Bijlsma (2018) [25]

The Netherlands

Unsolicited genetic information obtained using NGS

Individual interviews

Patients n = 24

Cancer

Bombard (2014) [26]

Canada

Gene expression profiling

Individual interviews, focus group discussion

Oncologists, n = 14

patients, n = 28

Breast cancer

Bombard (2015) [27]

Canada

Gene expression profiling

Individuals interviews

Oncologists n = 14

Breast cancer

Costa (2021) [28]

Canada

Prognostic-based genomic testing

Focus group discussions

Patients, n = 26

Lymphoid Cancers

Dodson (2017) [29]

USA

Pharmacogenomics

Open-ended survey

Oncology nurses, n = 28

Cancer

Hamilton (2021) [30]

USA

Precision oncology

Focus group discussions

Oncology clinicians, n = 68

Breast, melanoma and thoracic cancer

Hamilton (2017) [31]

USA

Secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling

Individual interviews

Patients with advanced cancer, n = 40

Breast, bladder, colorectal, or lung cancer

Harris (2013) [32]

USA

Kirsten ras tumor mutation testing (KRAS)

Individual interviews

Oncologists, n = 34

Colorectal cancer

Kerr (2019) [33]

UK

Molecular cancer diagnosis/treatment

Individual interviews

Practitioners n = 25

Cancer

Mamzer (2017)a [34]

France

Translational oncology research

Case study

Patient and expert committee members,

n = not specified

Cancer

McCradden (2020) [35]

Canada

AI in health care research

Individual interviews

Patients, caregivers, and health-care providers, n = 30

Meningioma

Perry (2017) [36]

Germany

"Personalized" treatment research (e.g. biomarkers for stratification)

Individual interviews

Patients, n = 40

Colorectal cancer

Pellegrini (2011) [37]

France

Tumor gene expression analysis

Individual interviews

Patients, n = 37

Breast cancer

Pichler (2020) [38]

Germany

Molecular diagnosis

Individual interviews

Patients, n = 30

Cancer, advanced stage

Rattay (2018) [39]

UK

Predictive radiogenomics testing for breast radiation toxicity

Individual interviews

Patients, n = 21

Breast cancer

Rohrmoser (2019) [40]

Germany

Molecular diagnostics

Individual interviews

Patients, n = 30

Cancer, advanced stage

Steltzer (2020) [41]

Austria

Personalized medicine

Individual interviews

Patients n = 2

Health care professionals, n = 14

Cancer

Therond (2020) [42]

UK

BRCA genetic testing

Observation and individual interviews

Patients, n = 25

Breast, ovarian

Wright (2019) [43]

UK

BRCA 1 & 2 testing

Individual interviews and team meetings

Clinicians

n = 19, teams

Breast cancer

Mixed-methods

 Best (2020) [44]

Australia

Somatic molecular profiling (MP) test results

Survey and individual interviews

Patients survey n = 1299, interview n = 20

Advanced cancers

Quantitative methods

 Issa (2013) [45]

USA

Novel personalized medicine genomic diagnostics

Discrete Choice Experiment survey

Patients, n = 300

breast and colorectal

 Soellner (2021) [46]

USA

AI for diagnostics

Survey

Public, n = 452

Skin cancer

 Yang (2019) [47]

China

AI in medicine

Survey

Patients, n = 527

Cancer

Theoretical, opinion pieces

 Aminololama-Shakeri (2019) [48]

USA

AI in breast imaging radiology

Opinion paper

 

Breast

 Ansmann (2018) [49]

Germany

Precision medicine

Commentary

 

Cancer

 Bunnik (2021) [50]

The Netherlands

Genomic sequencing

Perspective

 

Cancer

 Carter (2020) [51]

Australia

AI systems

Theoretical review

 

Breast cancer

 Korngiebel (2017) [52]

USA

Pharmacogenomic tests and tests for inherited cancer risk

Review/theoretical

 

Cancer

 Marchiano (2018) [53]

USA

Precision oncology

Communication

 

Cancer

 McFarland (2017) [54]

USA

Precision medicine oncology and targeted therapies

Editorial

 

Cancer

 McFarland (2017) [55]

USA

Precision medicine oncology

Editorial

 

Cancer

 McGrath (2021) [56]

USA

Genetic and genomic testing

Perspective

 

Cancer

 Stoeklé (2018) [57]

France

Precision medicine, Molecular tumor board (MTB)

Opinion paper

 

Cancer

 Triberti (2020) [58]

Italy

AI health decision making

Perspective

 

Cancer

  1. aThe study by Mamzer et al. (2017) is a description of the involvement of patient representatives and to establish a long-term partnership integrating patient’s expectations. No formal qualitative analysis was performed. It was, therefore, not included in the quality assessment