Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportions and odds ratios of patients who consented to primary health care data extraction and linkage for research, in relation to key socio-demographic characteristics

From: Participant characteristics and reasons for non-consent to health information linkage for research: experiences from the ATHENA COVID-19 study

 

Consent to data extraction for research

Model 1 OR (95% CI)

Model 2 OR (95% CI)

Model 3 OR (95% CI)

 

Agreed N (%)

   

Age (years)

 % increase per year*

581/842 (69%)

1.01 (1.00 – 1.02)a

1.02 (1.01 – 1.03)c

1.02 (1.01 – 1.03)c

Gender

 Male

288/421 (68.4)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Female

293/421 (69.6)

1.12 (0.83 – 1.50)

1.09 (0.80 – 1.47)

1.08 (0.80 – 1.46)

ARIA

 Major cities

427/616 (69.3)

1.00

-

1.00

 Inner regional

105/149 (70.5)

0.76 (0.49 – 1.16)

-

0.86 (0.55 – 1.35)

 Outer regional / remote / very remote

42/63 (66.7)

0.79 (0.44 – 1.39)

-

0.98 (0.54 – 1.80)

 Missing

7/14 (50)

-

-

-

SEIFA IRSD

 Most Disadvantaged

137/215 (63.7)

1.00

1.00

-

 2nd quartile

164/221 (72.6)

1.84 (1.20 – 2.83)b

1.88 (1.21 – 2.91)b

-

 3rd quartile

127/197 (65.9)

1.38 (0.89 – 2.13)

1.41 (0.88 – 2.25)

-

 Least Disadvantaged

153/209 (72.7)

1.97 (1.24 – 3.14)d

2.20 (1.33 – 3.64)e

-

  1. Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, and remoteness, measured with ARIA + . Model 3 is adjusted for age, sex, remoteness, and socioeconomic index. Age, sex, remoteness, and SEIFA IRSD are measured with or derived from NOCS data. SEIFA IRSD is measured in population-based quartiles. a p = 0.001; b p = 0.005; c p < 0.001; d p = 0.004; e p = 0.002
  2. *For every 1 year increase in age, the odds of consenting to data extraction increased by 1% in model 1, and 2% in models 2 and 3