Table 2 Summary of findings
DCS SUBSCALE (meaning) | Factors of the SDM intervention contributing to decrease decisional conflict | Factors of the SDM intervention contributing to increase decisional conflict |
|---|---|---|
INFORMED (knowledge of the decision) | ♣ Knowledge on the condition ♣ Previous experience with the treatment ♣ Graphical representation to deliver information on risk reduction | ♣ Not enough information on benefits and harms |
VALUE CLARITY (how clear preferences are in the decision) | ♣ Value elicitation exercises ♣ Decision analysis | ♣ Not having a health professional to clarify recommendation of the decision analysis |
SUPPORT IN THE DECISION-MAKING (if the amount of information provided is enough to support their decision-making process) | ♣ Evidence-based information ♣ Decision analysis | ♣ Low efficacy of the treatment for risk reduction ♣ Need of health professional to support the decision-making process |
UNCERTAINTY (how sure participants are with the decision and how easy it was to make the decision) | ♣ Value elicitation exercises | ♣ Low certainty of the evidence ♣ Decision analysis recommendation not on favor or against the treatment |
EFFECTIVE DECISION (adequately and appropriately informed decision-making, and satisfaction with the decision-making process) | ♣ Value elicitation exercises ♣ Decision analysis | ♣ Low quality of the evidence |