Skip to main content

Table 7 Subgroup analysis based on individualism/collectivism

From: Antecedents predicting digital contact tracing acceptance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Path

IND

k

N

Mean E.S.

95% C.I.

I 2

95% C.I.

p value

Perceived personal benefitsâ—ŠIntention to use

Low

5

2342

0.65

0.45

0.79

0.95

0.92

0.97

0.093

High

6

6461

0.41

0.18

0.61

0.99

0.98

0.99

 

Normsâ—ŠIntention to use

Low

6

2212

0.49

0.37

0.59

0.95

0.91

0.97

0.016

High

4

2066

0.68

0.57

0.76

0.80

0.48

0.92

 

Privacy concernsâ—ŠIntention to use

Low

3

1482

0.10

-0.20

0.38

0.95

0.90

0.98

0.040

High

6

5970

-0.28

-0.46

-0.08

0.99

0.98

0.99

 

Perceived ease of useâ—ŠIntention to use

Low

5

1487

0.39

0.03

0.66

0.99

0.98

0.99

0.623

High

3

1515

0.52

0.07

0.79

0.96

0.91

0.98

 

Attitude towards DCTâ—ŠIntention to use

Low

2

587

0.47

-0.16

0.83

0.98

0.95

0.99

0.530

High

3

2227

0.66

0.24

0.87

0.99

0.99

1.00

 
  1. IND denotes individualism/collectivism, k means number of studies, N means total sample size, E.S. refers to effect size, C.I. means confidence interval and NA refers to not available