Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of multiple models on the Brats2018 validation dataset and the analysis of the significant differences between the performance of Swin Unet3D on the validation set and the performance of other models using the Wilcoxon sign test

From: Swin Unet3D: a three-dimensional medical image segmentation network combining vision transformer and convolution

Model name

Params

Params size

Mean dice

Significant difference

 

(M)

(MB)

ET

TC

WT

ET

TC

WT

3D U-Net

7.9

15.834

0.704

0.763

0.869

No

Yes

Yes

V-Net

45.6

91.216

0.361

0.528

0.801

Yes

Yes

Yes

UnetR

102

204.899

0.743

0.767

0.869

Yes

Yes

Yes

TransBTS

33.0

65.975

0.707

0.723

0.844

Yes

Yes

No

SwinBTS

15.7

34.411

0.732

0.717

0.863

No

No

No

AttentionUnet

23.6

47.257

0.613

0.550

0.658

Yes

Yes

Yes

Swin Pure Unet3D

33.6

67.163

0.657

0.646

0.797

Yes

Yes

Yes

Swin Unet3D

33.7

67.403

0.716

0.761

0.874

–

–

–

  1. Bold values indicate the best metrics