Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance comparison of multiple models on the Brats2021 validation dataset and and the analysis of the significant differences between the performance of Swin Unet3D on the validation set and the performance of other models using the Wilcoxon sign test

From: Swin Unet3D: a three-dimensional medical image segmentation network combining vision transformer and convolution

Model name

Params

Params size

Mean dice

Significant difference

 

(M)

(MB)

ET

TC

WT

ET

TC

WT

3D U-Net

7.9

15.834

0.825

0.844

0.900

Yes

No

Yes

V-Net

45.6

182.432

0.815

0.840

0.751

No

Yes

Yes

UnetR

102

204.899

0.842

0.853

0.905

Yes

No

Yes

TransBTS

33.0

65.975

0.824

0.843

0.889

Yes

Yes

Yes

SwinBTS

35.7

71.394

0.828

0.843

0.896

Yes

Yes

Yes

AttentionUnet

23.6

47.257

0.841

0.851

0.870

No

No

No

Swin Pure Unet3D

33.6

67.163

0.817

0.822

0.885

Yes

Yes

Yes

Swin Unet3D

33.7

67.403

0.834

0.866

0.905

–

–

–

  1. Bold values indicate the best metrics