Table 3 Participants’ opinions about users’ autonomy after using the system
From: Data management system for diabetes clinical trials: a pre-post evaluation study
Users’ autonomy | Much more than expected Fr (%) | More than expected Fr (%) | Slightly more than expected Fr (%) | As expected Fr (%) | Slightly less than expected Fr (%) | Less than expected Fr (%) | Much less than expected Fr (%) | Mean | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of controlling various dimensions of clinical trial data management? | 13 (43.4%) | 7 (23.3%) | 5 (16.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 | 1.14 | ||
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of managing research centers in a clinical trial? | 8 (26.6%) | 9 (30.0%) | 7 (23.3%) | 4 (13.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 1.22 | ||
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of managing all people involved in a clinical trial? | 9 (30.0%) | 8 (26.6%) | 5 (16.7%) | 6 (20.0%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | 1.31 | ||
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of controlling case report forms of the participants? | 9 (30.0%) | 10 (33.4%) | 3 (9.9%) | 6 (20.0%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 1.30 | ||
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of controlling security of clinical trial data? | 8 (26.6%) | 7 (23.3%) | 6 (20.0%) | 7 (23.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 0 | 5.4 | 1.36 | ||
By using the system, how well are your needs met in terms of controlling quality of clinical trial data? | 12 (40.0%) | 8 (26.6%) | 6 (20.0%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 | 1.08 | ||
Total mean and SD | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 5.7 | 1.24 | ||