Table 2 Acceptability of decision aid among breast cancer survivors
From: Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for navigating breast cancer survivorship care
|  | Round 1 (n = 5) | Round 2 (n = 5) | Round 3 (n = 5) |
|---|---|---|---|
Format | |||
Ease of navigation, n (%) | |||
 Easy | 5 (100%) | 3 (60%) | 5 (100%) |
 Neutral | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 Difficult | 0 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Interactivity, n (%) | |||
 Yes | 1 (20%) | 3 (60%) | 4 (80%) |
 Neutral | 3 (60%) | 1 (20%) | 0 |
 No | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) |
Content of decision aid | |||
Balance of information presentation, n (%) | |||
 Slanted towards the usual care option | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 Balanced | 2 (40%) | 2 (40%) | 5 (100%) |
 Slanted towards the shared care option | 3 (60%) | 3 (60%) | 0 |
Length of decision aid, n (%) | |||
 Too long | 4 (80%) | 1 (20%) | 0 |
 Just right | 1 (20%) | 4 (80%) | 5 (100%) |
 Too short | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Perceived utility for decision-making | |||
Helpfulness of preference clarification exercise, n (%) | |||
 Helpful | 4 (80%) | 3 (60%) | 4 (80%) |
 Neutral | 0 | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) |
 Not helpful | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Utility in making decision, n (%) | |||
 Useful | 3 (60%) | 4 (80%) | 4 (80%) |
 Not useful | 2 (40%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) |
Routine use of decision aid | |||
Willingness to discuss decision aid with health care professionals, n (%) | |||
 Yes | 5 (100%) | 4 (80%) | 5 (100%) |
 No | 0 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Willingness to recommend the decision aid to other cancer survivors, n (%) | |||
 Yes | 4 (80%) | 4 (80%) | 5 (100%) |
 No | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Preferred mode of distribution, n (%) | |||
 Digital | 4 (80%) | 4 (80%) | 1 (20%) |
 Neutral | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) | 3 (60%) |
 Paper | 0 | 0 | 1 (20%) |
Suitable time to introduce decision aid, n (%) | |||
 Upon diagnosis | 1 (20%) | 0 | 1 (20%) |
 During active treatment | 0 | 0 | 1 (20%) |
 Immediately after active treatment | 0 | 3 (60%) | 2 (40%) |
 Years after active treatment | 3 (60%) | 1 (20%) | 1 (20%) |
 Others | 1 (20%)a | 1 (20%)b | 0 |