Peer Review reports
From: Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 26 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carly Marten |
| 28 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 14 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Evelien De Sutter |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Evelien De Sutter |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carly Marten |
| 31 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Nov 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Nov 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-022-02039-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.