Peer Review reports
From: Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
26 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carly Marten |
28 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
14 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Evelien De Sutter |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Evelien De Sutter |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carly Marten |
31 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
3 Nov 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Nov 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-022-02039-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.