Peer Review reports
From: Mitigating urinary incontinence condition using machine learning
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
2 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
5 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giovanni Cicceri |
20 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Abdulaziz Ahmed |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Abdulaziz Ahmed |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Abdulaziz Ahmed |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giovanni Cicceri |
25 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
25 Aug 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Abdulaziz Ahmed |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Aug 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
31 Aug 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Sep 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-022-01987-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.