Skip to main content

Table 7 Configural effects for predicting high and low behavioural intentions towards m-health

From: Factors influencing the elderly’s adoption of mHealth: an empirical study using extended UTAUT2 model

Configural models for predicting high behavioural intentions towards m-health

Configural models for predicting low behavioural intentions towards m-health

BI = f (PE, EE, SI, FC, HM, PV, HB, SQ and QL)

 ~ BI = f (PE, EE, SI, FC, HM, PV, HB, SQ and QL)

Configural Models (Sufficient causal recipes)

Raw coverage

Unique Coverage

Consistency

Configural Models (Sufficient causal recipes)

Raw coverage

Unique Coverage

Consistency

Model 1: ~ EE*SI* ~ FCI*HM*PV*HA*SQ* ~ QL

0.721

0.010

0.986

Model 1: ~ PE* ~ EE*SI* ~ PV* ~ HA *SQ*QL

0.811

0.145

0.949

Model 2: PE* ~ EE*SI* ~ FCI*HM*PV*HA*SQ

0.714

0.018

0.986

Model 2: ~ PE* ~ EE*SI* ~ PV* ~ HA

0.711

0.031

0.803

Model 3: PE*EE*SI*FC*HM*PV*HA* QL

0.546

0.015

0.995

Solution coverage: 0.767

Solution coverage: 0.900

Solution consistency: 0.856

Solution consistency: 0.824

  1. Performance expectancy = PE, Effort expectancy = EE, Social influence = SI, Facilitating condition = FC, Hedonic motivation = HM, Price value = PV, Habit = HA, Service quality = SQ, Quality of life = QL, Behavioural intention = BI, Use behavior = UB