Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Aug 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Teddy Lazebnik |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Aug 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 26 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 17 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 31 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 15 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Teddy Lazebnik |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 26 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 27 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 16 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Teddy Lazebnik |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 31 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Teddy Lazebnik |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 7 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Teddy Lazebnik |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 7 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 May 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 May 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-022-01877-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.