Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated compliance from the segmented linear regression model and equivalent rates of change immediately before and after each intervention and medication switch

From: Electronic prescribing systems as tools to improve patient care: a learning health systems approach to increase guideline concordant prescribing for venous thromboembolism prevention

Intervention

Estimated compliance

Equivalent rate of change in compliance per 52 weeks

Before

After

p value

Before

After

p value

1. Intervention 1. Introduction of a Junior doctor dashboard

73.2

70.7

0.035

3.4

9.8

 < 0.001

2. Intervention 2. Introduction of mandatory VTE assessment and prescribing

82.9

95.4

 < 0.001

9.8

− 0.7

 < 0.001

3. Intervention 3. Change in order of ‘no reduced mobility’

94.2

93.2

0.010 (0.464)

 − 0.7

− 1.0

N/A (0.085)

Medication switches

      

1. Enoxaparin to Tinzaparin

91.4

91.2

 < 0.001

− 1.0

1.4

 < 0.001

2. Tinzaparin back to Enoxaparin

93.3

92.5

0.023

1.4

0.0

0.011

  1. Figures in parentheses for intervention 3 are p values if a slope change for intervention 3 is included in the model. As this was not significant, it was excluded and as a result the step change for intervention 3 became significant (the p value changing from 0.464 to 0.010). The final model includes five step changes and four slope changes