Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The perceived importance of prognostic aspects considered by physicians during work disability evaluation: a survey

Original Submission
30 Oct 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Pauline Snoeck-Krygsman
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Jun 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Pauline Snoeck-Krygsman
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Taylor
13 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Pauline Snoeck-Krygsman
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Pauline Snoeck-Krygsman
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sylvia Pauline Snoeck-Krygsman
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Jan 2022 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12911-022-01758-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page