Peer Review reports
From: Comparison of different feature extraction methods for applicable automated ICD coding
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 May 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matus Falis |
| 16 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Nov 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Wei Zhao |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Nov 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Wei Zhao |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matus Falis |
| 28 Nov 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Wei Zhao |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Wei Zhao |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 14 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Wei Zhao |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 14 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 22 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 26 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matus Falis |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Jan 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Jan 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-022-01753-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.