Skip to main content

Table 5 Predictive performance of all machine learning models

From: Application of machine learning to predict the occurrence of arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction

Models

Accuracy

AUC

Specificity

False negative rate

False positive rate

All features

Decision tree

0.627 (95% CI, 0.598–0.656)

0.575 (95% CI, 0.545–0.603)

0.963

0.915

0.037

Random forest

0.646 (95% CI, 0.617–0.675)

0.596 (95% CI, 0.567–0.652)

0.869

0.755

0.131

Artificial neural network

0.650 (95% CI, 0.607–0.675)

0.625 (95% CI, 0.579–0.672)

0.861

0.665

0.139

Feature selection

Decision tree

0.642 (95% CI, 0.613–0.671)

0.592 (95% CI, 0.563–0.648)

0.963

0.915

0.037

Random forest

0.648 (95% CI, 0.601–0.695)

0.605 (95% CI, 0.558 –0.652

0.913

0.802

0.087

Artificial neural network

0.668 (95% CI, 0.621–0.714)

0.654 (95% CI, 0.625–0.683)

0.922

0.755

0.078

Grace variable sets

Decision tree

0.622 (95% CI, 0.576–0.668)

0.554 (95% CI, 0.508–0.601)

0.973

0.927

0.027

Random forest

0.627 (95% CI, 0.598–0.656)

0.575 (95% CI, 0.545–0.603)

0.966

0.904

0.034

Artificial neural network

0.644 (95% CI, 0.615–0.673)

0.594 (95% CI, 0.565–0.65)

0.892

0.778

0.108