Peer Review reports
From: Patient similarity analytics for explainable clinical risk prediction
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Jan 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 4 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fei Teng |
| 7 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Hao Sen Andrew Fang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fei Teng |
| 31 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 3 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Hao Sen Andrew Fang |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 11 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fei Teng |
| 14 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Hao Sen Andrew Fang |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 14 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Jun 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Jul 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-021-01566-y |
You can find further information about peer review here.