Peer Review reports
From: Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Jan 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 12 Feb 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 17 Feb 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 31 Mar 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Meneses-Echavez |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 13 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 11 May 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Meneses-Echavez |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 May 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 May 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 May 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-021-01532-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.