Skip to main content

Table 4 Significant differences for three models between four reclassification groups on five clinical measures

From: A novel model to label delirium in an intensive care unit from clinician actions

 

Reclassification Groups

Double + 

vs

Double─

Double + 

vs

Reclassified + 

Reclassified + 

vs

Reclassified─

Double-

vs

Reclassified─

Expected Relationship

Different

p < 0.05a

Same

p > 0.05a

Different

p < 0.05a

Same

p > 0.05a

Novel Model

    

Age

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

Discharge location

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

Death in hospital

 < 0.00005

0.00011

0.0452

0.0859

30-day mortality

0.00072

0.115

0.00017

0.0011

one-year mortality

 < 0.00005

0.178

0.0017

 < 0.00005

Puelle’s Classifier

    

Age

 < 0.00005

0.00097

 < 0.00005

0.964

Discharge location

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

0.00062

0.00062

Death in hospital

0.0017

 < 0.00005

0.820

0.103

30-day mortalityb

0.0949

–

–

–

one-year mortality

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

0.660

0.0015

Kim’s Classifierc

    

Age

 < 0.00005

0.0130

–

–

Discharge location

 < 0.00005

 < 0.00005

–

–

Death in hospital

0.0035

 < 0.00005

–

–

30-day mortalityb

0.472

–

–

–

one-year mortality

 < 0.00005

0.0010

–

–

  1. Binary classification generates four groups of subjects, including two groups of reclassified hospitalizations, which were compared by biological validation to assess model goodness-of-fit. Double-Positives are expected to differ from Double-Negatives. In the case of successful reclassification, we expect Double-Positives to be similar to Reclassified-Positives, Double-Negatives to be similar to Reclassified-Negatives, and Reclassified-Positives to differ from Reclassified-Negatives. Bolded fields represent p-values concordant with expectations of good model fit
  2. ap-values were generated from pairwise chi-squared testing with the Holm correction for all measures except age, which was tested with pairwise Tukey multiple comparisons of means
  3. bPairwise testing was not performed in the event of no significant difference between Double-Positives and Double-Negatives
  4. cThe Kim model does not generate reclassified negatives, making associated tests unavailable