Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An empirical analysis of dealing with patients who are lost to follow-up when developing prognostic models using a cohort design

Original Submission
5 Aug 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Sep 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 Aug 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Oct 2020 Author responded Author comments - Jenna M Reps
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Oct 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Jenna M Reps
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Jenna M Reps
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Jan 2021 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12911-021-01408-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\