Skip to main content

Table 2 Qualitative spectrum of criteria and procedures in data use and access governance in CDW

From: Implementation of data access and use procedures in clinical data warehouses. A systematic review of literature and publicly available policies

MAIN CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY

REQUIREMENTS

 

Recipient

Recipient categorization

Roles

Status

Authorized vs. non-authorized

Internal vs. external

Recipient background

Professional background

Academic staff

Healthcare professionals

Office staff

Researchers

Other background

Organizations

Patients

Students

Recipient qualifications

Human-subjects training

Recipient relation to CDW

Affiliation

Reciprocity

Reuse

Reuse purpose

Research purposes

General research

Clinical trials

Epidemiological studies

Feasibility check for research

Health services research

(Non-)human subject research

Observational studies

Personalized treatments

Health care purposes

Audit

Care management

Clinical care coordination

Clinical quality improvement

Facilitating organ, eye or tissue donation and transplantation

Public health reporting

Other reuse purposes

Grant application support

Marketing

Reuse setup

Clear documentation provided

Dissemination plan provided

Feasibility assessment provided

Funding provided

Process details provided

Reuse risk mitigation

Data protection

HIPAA compliance

IRB authorization

No contacting data subjects

No reidentification

No resharing without approval

Reuse values

Ethical soundness

Responsibleness

Compliance

Privacy

Responsible reuse

Patient-centricity

Clinical relevance

Patients first

Non-competitiveness

Business issues

Collaboration principles

Non-profit

Scientific soundness

Good research conduct

Innovation

Merits

Appropriateness

Appropriateness of requests

Appropriateness of results

Mission consistent with CDW

Reputation

Formal requirements

Data reuse documents

Data access/ sharing/ use agreement

Data collaboration agreement

Ethical agreements

Honorary/ substantive contract

Participation agreement

Term license agreement

General policies and regulations

Ethics

Consent

IRB approval

Laws

General laws

Specific laws

Other general policies and regulations

FAIR principles

Statewide policy guidance

Local policies and regulations

Information governance

Data access policies

Data identifying/ access/ sharing/ publishing protocols

Data management policies

Privacy/ security policies

Protocol review guidelines

Research policy

SOPs

Fees

STRUCTURES AND PROCEDURES

 

Review bodies

Governance bodies

Board of directors

Clinical committee

Department head

Director of professional services

Executive board

IRB

Project review committee

Privacy board

Privacy and security committee

Policy advisory groups

Use and access committee

Working groups

Scientific review bodies

Academic staff

Data analysts

Health information research unit

Research committee

Scientific peer-review

Patient review bodies

Patient-led oversight committee

Review values

General values

Appropriate competency

Fine-grained control

Holistic governance

Reducing bias

Empirical evaluation

No conflict of interest

Objective review

Transparent review

Reducing investment

Effective review

Timely review

Managing competitiveness

Collaboration

Community before individual

ACCESS

 

Access limitations

Limited data

Aggregated data set

De-identified data set

Limited data set

Limited location

Remote access

View only

Virtual access

Limited time