Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory

Table 5 Comparision of different autoverification systems in the studies

Study	Year	Country	Assay	System Type	Sample Number	Passing Rate
Randell EW et al [6]	2018	Canada	Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay	Middleware	80,867	91.1 to 94.7%
Xia LY et al [27]	2017	China	Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay	LIS	31,349	74.0%
Krasowski MD et al [28]	2014	USA	Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay	Middleware	–	99.5%
Palmieri R et al [29]	2018	Italy	Urinalysis	AutionMAX-SediMAX	1002	52.4%
Sediq AM et al [5]	2014	Egypt	Thyroid Function	LIS	563	63.8%
Zhao Y et al [16]	2014	China	Coagulation	Middleware	2353	82.0%
Our Study	–	China	Coagulation	LIS	83,699	78.86%