Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Comparision of different autoverification systems in the studies

From: Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory

Study Year Country Assay System Type Sample Number Passing Rate
Randell EW et al [6] 2018 Canada Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay Middleware 80,867 91.1 to 94.7%
Xia LY et al [27] 2017 China Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay LIS 31,349 74.0%
Krasowski MD et al [28] 2014 USA Clinical Chemistry and immunoassay Middleware 99.5%
Palmieri R et al [29] 2018 Italy Urinalysis AutionMAX-SediMAX 1002 52.4%
Sediq AM et al [5] 2014 Egypt Thyroid Function LIS 563 63.8%
Zhao Y et al [16] 2014 China Coagulation Middleware 2353 82.0%
Our Study China Coagulation LIS 83,699 78.86%
  1. LIS Laboratory information system