Peer Review reports
From: The Generalized Data Model for clinical research
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Nov 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Nov 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark D. Danese |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Nov 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Jan 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Dallas Boyd |
6 Jul 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Bate |
9 Jul 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Kahn |
18 Jul 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - P R. Rijnbeek |
4 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark D. Danese |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Kahn |
27 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Dallas Boyd |
7 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Bate |
9 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - P R. Rijnbeek |
28 Nov 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark D. Danese |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Nov 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - P R. Rijnbeek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
10 Jun 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Jun 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12911-019-0837-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.