Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Performance of deep learning based dependency parsers on the MiPACQ corpus (%)

From: Parsing clinical text using the state-of-the-art deep learning based parsers: a systematic comparison

Parser Corpus Word embeddings UAS LS LAS
Stanford parser Penn TreeBank Gigaword 80.62 89.09 77.59
MiPACQ Gigaword 90.49 94.95 89.00
MiPACQ MIMICIII 90.30 94.84 88.75
Bist-parser Penn TreeBank Gigaword 81.08 89.35 78.20
MiPACQ Gigaword 90.72 95.18 89.25
MiPACQ MIMICIII 90.62 95.16 89.16
Dependency-tf Penn TreeBank Gigaword 79.14   
MiPACQ Gigaword 88.65   
MiPACQ MIMICIII 88.80   
jPTDP-parser Penn TreeBank Gigaword 79.47 85.76 74.62
MiPACQ Gigaword 88.50 92.36 85.53
MiPACQ MIMICIII 88.94 92.69 86.10
  1. Highest performance in terms of each evaluation criterion is highlighted in boldface