Design Principle | Design Principle Details | Examples of Solutions | Change in User Interface |
---|---|---|---|
1 Ensure Patient Safety | 1a Build algorithm content based on established clinical guidelines | Use of the NCCN guidelines for cancer pain management to guide algorithm content [63] | Based on published best practices, evidence-based content used for developing symptom management algorithms |
Iterative review process of algorithm content and recommendations by multidisciplinary expert panel members | |||
1b Identify at the beginning of a session potentially serious conditions for which continued use of algorithm could be harmful or life threatening | Additional characteristics of symptoms that suggest potentially dangerous or life threatening conditions identified. e.g., “in pain algorithm, besides enquiring about new or increased pain, adding a question that asksabout cramping or squeezing in chest or stomach”. | Questions added that identify severity and trigger “call now” advice. | |
CDS updated for immediate exit and to contact clinician if red flag was triggered | |||
Distinguished nuances between pain symptoms, (e.g. new pain (e.g. fracture) and chronic pain) | Any time red flag is triggered, patient provided with specific suggestions on the screen. | ||
Disclaimer needed to ensure safety (e.g. “In case of emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. Do not use this program for medical emergencies.”) | Warning placed on the welcome page of the program. | ||
Bold font used as a way to capture patients’ attention. | |||
There should be gradation of severity indicating what issues should the patient address first | Visual cues added to the report to help prioritize self-management strategies | ||
Colors (red-orange-green) and fonts used to ensure patient reviewed specific aspect of the report. e.g. call clinician now | |||
Report provided at the end can be viewed on the screen or as a printed report | |||
1c Inquire about appropriateness of recommendations prior to offering advice | Provide guidance on why particular intervention should not be implemented (e.g. taking ibuprofen) | Content modified to provide reasons why a particular intervention would not be permissible (e.g. stomach ulcers) | |
Provide language to ensure any questions are directed to care team at all times | Report content updated to contact clinician if uncertainty about concerns on implementing recommendations | ||
2 Communicate Clinical Concepts Effectively | 2a Test word selection with intended end-users | Cognitive testing of terms and its interpretation | Modified wording utilized in assessment and recommendations to improve understanding of concepts |
2b Develop explicit, detailed questions | Remove ambiguity of decision points | Added specificity of timeframes to questions to improve meaning (, e.g., “Did taking short acting pain medication give you relief from your pain within 30 min of taking it?”) | |
Reference specific medications and dosages as appropriate | |||
Designed explicit decisions points to enable machine processing | |||
2c Enhance communication with graphics, especially for clinical concepts | Improve system use by reducing content | Added “faces” and word anchors as part of the pain scale | |
Created content at a 5th grade reading level | |||
Inserted images to re-enforce concepts (e.g., stop sign for emergency, picture to show acid reflux) | |||
2d Provide lists to enable patient to identify specific items such as medications | Utilization of system could be improved by equipping patients with necessary information | Provided lists of most common medications in defined classes in a designated area of the screen for lookup as needed | |
Included generic and brand names of medications for ease of recognition | |||
2e Provide educational information to promote understanding | Using CDS as a way to reinforce and provide education on why certain questions are being asked | Educational content added in final summary reports customized to their symptoms | |
Provided rationale of why certain questions were asked and promoted understanding | |||
2f Enhance readability with font style, font size, content density, selective highlighting of words | Improve utility by improving layout of content | Used large and “heavier” font size to make text more visible | |
Reduced text density | |||
Used a plain white background | |||
Provided bolding to emphasize words | |||
3 Promote Communication with Clinicians | 3a Provide explicit instructions for patients regarding contacting clinicians about their concerns | Urgency of establishing clinical contact based on severity of the symptom needed(e.g. call right away vs. waiting 24 h) | Additional features added to generate report immediately on screen if patient triggered any of the emergency “red flag” questions and highlighted the importance of calling clinician NOW. |
Post assessment report that provides guidance on what should be done and when. | Immediate instructions provided to the patient, on calling clinician, onscreen of the program and not just within the report. | ||
Added explicit language on what patients should say when calling clinician. | |||
Initial reports lost the message about the importance of communicating with the clinician | Report restructured to reinforce importance of contacting clinicians and keeping them informed of regimen changes. E.g. tell your doctor or nurse you are taking 200 mg of ibuprofen as needed. | ||
Clearly communicate recommendations | Report modified into sections of: do now, do next and more suggestions, to help streamline and prioritize suggestions for what the patient can do and when | ||
Lack of specification of which symptoms are available for assessment at beginning of the program | 3 symptoms patients can choose in current system listed at the beginning of the program. | ||
Patients advised to contact clinicians if experiencing symptoms not addressed by the system. | |||
3b Encourage patients to notify their clinical care team about interventions that they have followed | Reinforce the importance of notifying clinicians about any interventions that have been initiated within the recommendations | Provided instructions about what patients should specifically tell their clinicians about interventions | |
4 Support Patient Activation | 4a Determine what resources are available to the patient | Improve efficiency of the system and utilization by modifying question based on what patients have available to them | Added questions to determine what interventions had already been prescribed |
Inquired if a prescription was already available for a recommended medication as a way to align with current therapy of the patient’s care team | |||
4b Identify health beliefs that may impact interpretation of content and modify content accordingly | Modifying how content is framed | Content modified conveying meaning acceptable by patients. (e.g. pain medication vs. narcotics) | |
4c Determine what patients are willing to do prior to making recommendations | Improving look and feel of the system that quickly provides information and allows the patient to take an active role in their care | Provided explicit, detailed instructions that include dosage amounts, frequencies, medication list and lifestyle suggestions | |
Prioritized display in patient report to quickly and easily inform the patient on what they should do next | |||
4d Provide explicit, detailed, actionable instructions to the extent possible | Inquired about what patients were willing to do prior to recommending an intervention, e.g., use of enemas for constipation | ||
4e Personalize content, e.g., used possessive pronouns such as “my” or “your” where appropriate | Create an opportunity relate to the patient and provide self-management techniques | Changed the text to make it personable and user friendly, e.g., used possessive pronouns such as “my” or “your” where appropriate | |
5 Facilitate Navigation and Use | 5a Designate consistent presentation areas on screen for repeated display of a specific type of information | Make it easy for patients to find information within the site | Posted medical terms with definitions in a specific area on the screen so end user can easily and quickly access information as needed |
Avoided “pop-ups” because they felt to be interruptive and harder to navigate for a limited computer proficient user | |||
5b Provide comprehensive set of selection options | Ensure all possible decision points are covered | Guidelines and best practices used for comprehensive coverage to ensure all possible selections covered for every decision node | |
5c Streamline data entry | Improve flow and provide feedback quickly | Introduced check boxes to cut down on number of questions required to determine what advice to provide and improved efficiency | |
5d Optimize workflow through questions | Inquiring about symptom characteristics at the beginning of the algorithm | Enabled selection of an item on a page to advance to the next page as appropriate | |
Directed patients to highly specific interventions | |||
5e Optimize workflow through questions | Inquiring about symptom characteristics at the beginning of the algorithm | Facilitated patients starting at the appropriate place in the algorithm by inquiring what interventions have already been attempted | |
Introduced check boxes to reduce number of question and reduce redundancy | |||
5f Track progress for patient | Promote efficient workflow | Added progress bar showing numeric value, not just graphic representing progress | |
Included “Go Back” function to allow patient to modify earlier responses | |||
5g Accommodate patient changes and pauses | Offered multiple ways to start over such as: “Back to Start button” as well as tabs with symptom names | ||
Included “Take a Break” button to allow patient to pause the program and come back to it again | |||
5h Provide context for all interactions so that patient recognizes where he/she is within an algorithm | Added tabs as a way to indicate to the patient which algorithm they were in | ||
Provided headers to supply context for each page anchoring the patient on where they are in a given algorithm | |||
5i Ensure completeness and uniqueness of pathways through algorithm | Provided brief overview of different topics that were covered to orient patients at the beginning of a session | ||
Re-enforced context and inter-relatedness of questions by showing question and answer from the previous page | |||
Ensured that questions allow for a single non-redundant, unique pathway for all possible scenarios | |||
Ensured that every pathway led to advice | |||
5j Create tools that will function across multiple platforms | Assessed target patient population to determine that 85% of patients had access or knew how to obtain access to computers or smart phones | Created CDS tool design to function on Web, smart phone, or iPad |