Skip to main content

Table 10 Comparison of the performance of Bayesian Network classifier (BN) using different search algorithms: K2, Hill Climbing, Repeated Hill Climber, LAGD Hill Climbing, TAN, Tabu and Simulated Annealing using Sampling

From: Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict all-cause mortality using fitness data: the Henry ford exercIse testing (FIT) project

 

K2

Hill Climbing

Repeated Hill Climber

LAGD Hill Climbing

TAN

Tabu

Simulated Annealing

Sensitivity

37.44%

37.44%

37.44%

47.65%

60.07%

37.59%

55.20%

Specificity

93.31%

93.31%

93.31%

91.55%

91.02%

93.20%

91.23%

Precision

52.11%

52.11%

52.11%

33.76%

27.32%

51.10%

29.71%

F-score

43.57%

43.57%

43.57%

39.52%

37.56%

43.31%

38.63%

RMSE

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.28

0.34

0.29

AUC

0.82

0.82

0.82

0.81

0.84

0.81

0.84