Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention

Original Submission
5 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Omneya Attallah
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Omneya Attallah
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Haiming Zhou
13 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Lo
2 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Pölsterl
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Omneya Attallah
1 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Haiming Zhou
13 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Lo
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Pölsterl
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Omneya Attallah
7 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sebastian Pölsterl
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
24 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12911-017-0508-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page