Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of stratified 10 × 5-fold cross validation with the CV set (patients recruited in Lisbon, Table 3), under the Time Windows and the First Last approaches

From: Predicting progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia using neuropsychological data: a supervised learning approach using time windows

 

AUC

Sensitivity

Specificity

 

FL

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Y

FL

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Y

FL

2Y

3Y

4Y

5Y

DT

0.65 ± 0.02

0.71 ± 0.04

0.75 ± 0.01

0.78 ± 0.02

0.79 ± 0.02

0.59 ± 0.03

0.65 ± 0.05

0.75 ± 0.04

0.71 ± 0.04

0.77 ± 0.02

0.68 ± 0.02

0.73 ± 0.04

0.69 ± 0.03

0.77 ± 0.03

0.75 ± 0.02

kNN

0.67 ± 0.01

0.77 ± 0.01

0.82 ± 0.01

0.83 ± 0.01

0.84 ± 0.01

0.60 ± 0.02

0.70 ± 0.03

0.87 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.03

0.83 ± 0.01

0.65 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.61 ± 0.01

0.81 ± 0.02

0.72 ± 0.03

SVM Poly

0.63 ± 0.01

0.70 ± 0.01

0.76 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.80 ± 0.01

0.43 ± 0.02

0.55 ± 0.02

0.71 ± 0.01

0.81 ± 0.02

0.86 ± 0.01

0.83 ± 0.01

0.84 ± 0.01

0.81 ± 0.01

0.77 ± 0.01

0.75 ± 0.02

SVM RBF

0.63 ± 0.01

0.64 ± 0.01

0.76 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.80 ± 0.02

0.40 ± 0.02

0.35 ± 0.02

0.72 ± 0.02

0.80 ± 0.02

0.89 ± 0.01

0.86 ± 0.01

0.93 ± 0.01

0.81 ± 0.01

0.78 ± 0.02

0.71 ± 0.03

NB

0.74 ± 0.00

0.82 ± 0.01

0.86 ± 0.00

0.87 ± 0.01

0.88 ± 0.00

0.64 ± 0.02

0.66 ± 0.01

0.75 ± 0.02

0.82 ± 0.01

0.88 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.02

0.82 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.78 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

LR

0.72 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.84 ± 0.01

0.84 ± 0.01

0.85 ± 0.01

0.47 ± 0.01

0.77 ± 0.02

0.85 ± 0.03

0.74 ± 0.01

0.78 ± 0.01

0.80 ± 0.01

0.66 ± 0.01

0.68 ± 0.02

0.81 ± 0.02

0.78 ± 0.02

RF

0.72 ± 0.01

0.79 ± 0.01

0.85 ± 0.01

0.86 ± 0.01

0.87 ± 0.01

0.59 ± 0.03

0.53 ± 0.04

0.75 ± 0.01

0.75 ± 0.01

0.87 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.02

0.86 ± 0.01

0.77 ± 0.02

0.81 ± 0.01

0.70 ± 0.02

  1. Note: DT: Decision Tree classifier, kNN: k-Nearest Neighbor classifier, SVM Poly: polynomial-kernel Support Vector Machines, SVM RB: Gaussian-kernel Support Vector Machines, NB: Naïve Bayes classifier, LR: Logistic Regression and RF: Random Forest
  2. The results were highlighted in bold whenever Time Windows approach outperformed the FL approach. cMCI represents the positive class