Skip to main content

Table 4 Number of studies meeting individual STARD modified criteria for validating health administrative data

From: Diagnostic accuracy of administrative data algorithms in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis: a systematic review

  Reported/Total
TITLE, KEYWORDS, ABSTRACT  
Identify article as study of assessing diagnostic accuracy 7/7
Identify article as study of administrative data 7/7
INTRODUCTION:  
State disease identification & validation one of goals of study 7/7
METHODS:  
Participants in validation cohort:  
Describe validation cohort (Cohort of patients to which reference standard was applied) 7/7
Age 6/7
Disease 6/7
Severity 1/7
Location/Jurisdiction 7/7
Describe recruitment procedure of validation cohort 6/7
Inclusion criteria 6/7
Exclusion criteria 6/7
Describe patient sampling (random, consecutive, all, etc.) 7/7
Describe data collection 7/7
Who identified patients and did selection adhere to patient recruitment criteria 5/7
Who collected data 6/7
A priori data collection form 6/7
Disease classification 7/7
Split sample (i.e. re-validation using a separate cohort) 0/7
Test Methods:  
Describe number, training and expertise of persons reading reference standard 6/7
If >1 person reading reference standard, quote measure of consistency (e.g. kappa) 6/7
Blinding of interpreters of reference standard to results of classification by administrative data e.g. Chart abstractor blinded to how that chart was coded 6/7
Statistical Methods:  
Describe methods of calculating/comparing diagnostic accuracy 7/7
RESULTS:  
Participants:  
Report when study done, start/end dates of enrollment 4/7
Describe number of people who satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria 6/7
Study flow diagram 2/7
Test results:  
Report distribution of disease severity 1/7
Report cross-tabulation of index tests by results of reference standard 7/7
Estimates:  
Report at least 4 estimates of diagnostic accuracy 5/7
Diagnostic Accuracy Measures Resported:  
Sensitivity 5/7
Spec 5/7
PPV 6/7
NPV 4/7
Likelihood ratios 1/7
kappa 4/7
Area under the ROC curve/C-statistic 0/7
Accuracy/agreement 1/7
Report accuracy for subgroups (e.g. age, geography, differen sex, etc.) 2/7
If PPV/NPV reported, ratio of cases/controls of validation cohort approximate prevalence of condition in the population 2/7
Report 95 % confidence intervals for each diagnostic measure 5/7
DISCUSSION:  
Discuss the applicability of the validation findings 7/7