Skip to main content

Table 2 Strategies used to develop, evaluate cancer-related PtDAs for disadvantaged social groups (k = 20)

From: Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials

Study

Eligibility criteria

Conceptual framework (if specified)

PtDA Format

Delivery Mode, setting

Sub-groups targeted in Dev.

Development (k = 17)

Evaluation (k = 14)

BCa, Genetic Testing

Lerman 1997 [40]

Women 18-75y, ≥1 1st-degree relative with BCa and/or ovarian cancer

Behavioral decision-making models

Structured education (45-60 min) + semi-structured counseling (15-30 min)

By nurse or genetic counselor at oncology clinic

BLK

NR

Included PtDA-by- race interaction (no difference)

BCa, Treatment

Jibaja-Weiss 2010 [50]

Women, early stage BCa

ODSF, EDAM

Interactive DVD/CD soap opera episodes, learning modules (43-207 min) [108]

By patient at clinic (with case manager assistance)

LOW-LIT, UNINS, BLK, HSP, SPN

Content developed by research team, expert advisory panel; usability, acceptability, demand tests conducted in subgroups [108]; adapted to SPN language [108]

A priori focus on multi-ethnic, low literacy women; use of low-literacy DCS

Marcus 2013 [51]

Women, early stage BCa

Social cognitive, self-regulation theories, Health Belief Model

Interactive, multimedia web-based program or CD (>60 min) + NCI print materials

By patient at home via computer or Internet

LOW-LIT

Content guided by formative research with patients and developed by NCI, literacy, patient education experts with 7th grade readability target; usability, acceptability, demand tests conducted; reviewed for cultural appropriateness [51]; features of development sample NR

NR

Street 1995 [52]

Women, stage I/II BCa

NR

Interactive, multimedia program (30-45 min) vs. brochure (8 pages)

By patient at oncology clinic

LOW-ED

NR

Stratified/analyzed patients by age-education level (found older-less educated patients were less engaged)

CRC, Screening

Miller 2011 [56]

50–74y, due for CRCS

Transtheoretical model

Interactive web-based program (~10.1 min)

By patient at primary care clinic

LOW-LIT, BLK

Content based on educational video [57] that was guided by subgroup interviews;[109, 110] navigation designed for “low-literacy” subgroup

Stratified/analyzed patients by literacy level (no difference); used REALM tool

Pignone 2000 [57]

50–75y, due for CRCS

Transtheoretical model

Educational video (11 min)

By patient at primary care clinic

LOW-ED, FEM, BLK

Content guided by subgroup interviews; assessed out-of-pocket cost concerns

NR

Ruffin 2007 [58]

50–70y, due for CRCS

Elaboration likelihood model

Interactive web-based education tool

By patient in community setting via Internet

FEM, BLK

Content and usability testing guided by subgroup FGs and interviews; race-, gender- and insurance-related issues, potential differences were explored [111].

A priori focus on blacks

Schroy 2011, 2012 [59, 60]

50–75y, due for CRCS

ODSF

Interactive DVD + personal risk assessment tool (20-30 min)

By patient at primary care clinic

LOW-ED, FEM, MCAID, BLK

Content guided by expert opinion, subgroup FGs and assessed out-of-pocket cost concerns, cultural sensitivity issues; usability tests conducted in subgroups

A priori focus on blacks and low-income non-Hispanic whites

PCa Screening

Chan 2011 [63]

Men ≥40y, no PCa history

ODSF

Script, slides + video clips of role models (90-120 min), short booklets

By promotores to community center groups

LOW-ED, UNINS, MCAID, NONUS, HSP, SPN

Content guided by key informants, FGs; concept mapping conducted with men/spouses; adapted to SPN language

A priori focus on Hispanic and immigrant men

Lepore 2012 [67]

Men 45-70y, no PCa history

ODSF, social learning theory

Pamphlet + counseling sessions (~26.3 min)

By patient at home + health-educator via phone

LOW-ED, BLK

Content guided by expert opinion; feedback from men in target subgroups (including picture selection); cognitive interviews [112]

A priori focus on black and immigrant men; used low-literacy DCS

Myers 2005 [68]

Men 40-69y, no PCa or BPH history

PHM, AHP

Booklet + decision counseling session

By patient at home + health-educator via phone

LOW-ED, BLK

Content field-tested by literacy expert in face-to-face interviews with subgroup [113]; decision counseling protocol pilot tested in primary care practices in target community [113]

A priori focus on black men

Myers 2011 [69]

Men 50-69y, no PCa or BPH history

PHM, AHP

Booklet + decision counseling session

By patient at home + health-educator at primary care clinic

Refer to Myers 2005 [68]

Refer to Myers 2005 [68]

NR

Sheridan 2012 [73]

Men 40-80y, no PCa history

NR

Video (12 min) + coaching session (8 min)

By patient at primary care clinic (with research assistance)

NONWHT

Content pre-tested in FGs, cognitive interviews, usability tests in subgroups

NR

Taylor 2013 [74]

Men 45-70y, no PCa history

NR

Interactive web-based tool + booklet (~34 min)

By patients at home

LOW-LIT, BLK

Content guided by expert opinion, key informants, subgroup FGs [114, 115]; adapted to 8th grade readability by plain language expert; usability, acceptability, demand tests conducted in subgroups with limited computer/internet skills [114, 116]

NR

Volk 2003 [76]

Men 45-70y, no PCa history

NR

Videotape (~20 min) + brochure

By patient at PC clinic

NR

NR

Stratified analysis by race (found difference in screening rates)

Volk 2008 [77]

Men 40-70y, no PCa history

ODSF, EDAM

Interactive DVD/CD-based soap opera episodes, learning modules (53-68 min)

By patient at public hospital clinic (with research assistance)

LOW-LIT, UNINS, BLK

Content tailored using racial/ethnic concordance, social matching; acceptability tests conducted in subgroups

Stratified analysis by literacy; a priori interest in low-literacy black men (found differences in acceptability, decisional conflict); used low-literacy DCS

Williams 2013 [78]

Men 40-70y, no PCa history

NR

Booklet

By patient at home vs. patient at cancer screening clinic

LOW-LIT, BLK

Content by expert opinion, key informants, subgroup FGs [114, 115]; adapted to 8th grade readability by plain language expert; usability tests conducted in subgroups [114]

Stratified sub-analyses by race, including race-by delivery mode interaction (no differences)

Wolf 1996 [79]

Men ≥50y, no PSA testing or PCa history

NR

Script about PSA screening

By research assistant at PC clinic

LOW-ED, NONWHT

Content developed by physician experts; piloted via subgroup interviews; assessed for comprehensibility

Stratified sub-analyses by income, education (no difference)

PCa Treatment

Berry 2013 [8183]

Men, localized PCa

ODSF

Interactive web-based program (~46 min) + usual patient education

Patient at home or oncology clinic

BLK

Content tailored by race via subgroup FGs, interviews [117, 118]; feasibility, acceptability tests conducted

Efficacy evaluation discussed decisional conflict by race (found differences in decisional conflict, perceived decision support)

Marcus 2013 [51]

Men, newly diagnosed localized PCa

Social cognitive, self-regulation theories, Health Belief Model

Interactive, multimedia web-based or CD program (>60 min) + NCI print materials

By patient at home via computer/internet

LOW-LIT, BLK

Content guided by formative research with patients and developed by NCI, literacy/patient education experts with 7th grade readability target; usability, acceptability, demand tests conducted; reviewed for cultural appropriateness [51]; features of development sample NR [119]

NR

  1. DM decision-making, BCa breast cancer, ODSF Ottawa Decision Support Framework, EDAM edutainment decision aid model, IDM informed decision-making, LIT low literacy, UNINS uninsured, BLK black, HSP Hispanic, SPN Spanish language, DCS decisional conflict scale, SDM shared decision-making, NCI National Cancer Institute, NR not reported, CRCS colorectal cancer screening, REALM Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, FEM female, FGs focus groups, MCAID Medicaid, PCa prostate cancer, NONUS non US-born, PSA prostate-specific antigen, NONWHT non-white