Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
15 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Priebe |
23 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anthony Jorm |
23 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
29 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
29 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
6 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Keith Lloyd |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
6 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
10 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-34 |
You can find further information about peer review here.