Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information

Original Submission
5 Nov 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Ancker
10 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
8 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Austoker
30 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
23 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Ancker
11 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Dolan
11 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 7
11 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
11 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 8
11 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
18 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 10
18 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
29 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Ulph
Resubmission - Version 13
29 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 13
Publishing
5 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-9-26

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page