Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Iain Gillespie |
1 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin |
17 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Mandl |
23 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nkuchia M'ikanatha |
26 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Moises Huaman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nkuchia M'ikanatha |
4 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Moises Huaman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Moises Huaman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Moises Huaman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
10 Mar 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Mar 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.