Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Denis Protti |
28 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pekka Ruotsalainen |
2 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Lagoe |
17 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Yasnoff |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
24 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Meryl Bloomrosen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Meryl Bloomrosen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Denis Protti |
21 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Yasnoff |
6 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Meryl Bloomrosen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Meryl Bloomrosen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
13 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Meryl Bloomrosen |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
13 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
23 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15 |
You can find further information about peer review here.