Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Original Submission
10 Apr 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kensaku Kawamoto
23 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dawn Dowding
27 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robyn Tamblyn
12 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kensaku Kawamoto
9 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robyn Tamblyn
6 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kensaku Kawamoto
3 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
3 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 9
3 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
5 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Holbrook
Resubmission - Version 10
5 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
11 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-9-11

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page