Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Construction of an odds model of coronary heart disease using published information: the Cardiovascular Health Improvement Model (CHIME)

Original Submission
6 Jun 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gil L'italien
3 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randi Selmer
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
26 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randi Selmer
18 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gil L'italien
8 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 9
8 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 9
15 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 10
15 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
Resubmission - Version 13
Submitted Manuscript version 13
16 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 14
16 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 14
25 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 15
25 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 15
27 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Martin
Resubmission - Version 16
27 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 16
Publishing
31 Oct 2008 Editorially accepted
31 Oct 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-49

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page