Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?

Original Submission
16 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
16 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton
23 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
24 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
18 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Sutton
14 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 6
13 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
19 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ian Shrier
Resubmission - Version 7
19 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 May 2008 Editorially accepted
21 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6947-8-19

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\