Peer Review reports
From: Is OpenSDE an alternative for dedicated medical research databases? An example in coronary surgery
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 28 Mar 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Angeliek Venema |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arek Kasprzyk |
| 27 Apr 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Cimino |
| 8 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Angeliek Venema |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Cimino |
| 20 Sep 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arek Kasprzyk |
| 17 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Angeliek Venema |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Oct 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Oct 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-7-31 |
You can find further information about peer review here.