Peer Review reports
From: The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Moshe Schein |
22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Burke |
28 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magne Nylenna |
21 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harold Lehmann |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
7 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harold Lehmann |
23 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Magne Nylenna |
24 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Teresa Jones |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Jun 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Jun 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-6-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.